Recent content by Dr_Eksplosive

  1. Dr_Eksplosive

    Bill: Draft Reveille Prison Clinic Resolution

    Details on what basic facilities are required in the clinic, staffing requirements, how will prisoners be charged and more relating to the function of the clinic would be very useful.
  2. Dr_Eksplosive

    Travelling

    Travelling
  3. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honour, the evidence was submitted in conjunction with the Defense’s closing statement and the separation of the messages was to preserve proper formatting. I request the courts to reconsider this denial as the...
  4. Dr_Eksplosive

    Bill: Vote Change Judicial Payments Act

    I meant to vote AYE
  5. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO SUBMIT LATE EVIDENCE The Defense wishes to submit the following evidence, post discovery as it was only revealed after discovery had concluded, to aid the court in understanding the matter at hand.
  6. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, The Plaintiff claims that the bot did not malfunction and has failed to prove it. wetc, the owner put it that the bot malfunctioned. In a previous case, it has been confirmed that this functionality is a feature...
  7. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    Your Honor, Apologies for the tardiness but I have taken extremely ill and my colleague is in the process of shifting apartments. As such, I request a 24 hour extension to provide a proper closing statement Apologies for any inconvenience caused.
  8. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 14

    CLOSING STATEMENTS While the Plaintiff makes a compelling argument, there are critical exclusions and pitfalls to their claims. Firstly, the Plaintiff claims that the reversal of their selection as HOJC Chair was in violation of the Electoral Act. However, nowhere in the Electoral Act does it...
  9. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. HenryDz5 [2024] FCR 65

    Your Honour, The Prosecution's entire argument hinges on speculation. Their claims can be refuted easily in quick succession: A) The bot did not have a limit in place. While it can be said that the Defendant may have falsified evidence proving this in a previous trial, the Prosecution has...
  10. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, The Prosecution's entire argument hinges on speculation. Their claims can be refuted easily in quick succession: A) The bot did not have a limit in place. While it can be said that the Defendant may have...
  11. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed kvogt2340 v. NavyGoober197 [2024] FCR 53

    Your Honour, I'd like to inform the Court that I no longer work for Lovely Law and have not worked for the firm for 2 weeks. I am not aware of the measures the firm will be taking to represent the Plaintiff, but I will no longer be representing the Plaintiff or the Lovely Law Firm in any...
  12. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. wetc [2024] FCR 64

    Your Honour, In light of recent events, MikamiLaw LLC will no longer be providing legal representation to wetc and wetc alone. We have recommended the Defendant seek new legal representation. Thank you for your time.
  13. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. HenryDz5 [2024] FCR 65

    MOTION TO AMEND Your Honour, it has come to my attention that I have mistyped the date of the submission, erroneously submitting it as submitted on 2/5/2024 when it is meant to be on 5/5/2024. Permission to rectify this error?
  14. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Steveshat v. HenryDz5 [2024] FCR 65

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Steveshat Plaintiff v. HenryDz5 Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. We affirm the deposit was placed. We neither affirm or deny the balance could be withdrawn at any time. 2. We affirm the plaintiff's victory. We neither...
Back
Top