IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Lawanoesepr
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
AFFIRM that on June 30th, Redmont Citizen lawanoespr (“Plaintiff”) was at spawn while affected by a disease and actively spreading it...
OBJECTION - PERJURY
Many of the employees listed, myself included, did not work with Plaintiff directly. They therefore cannot provide relevant testimony about his work performance or character, having never interacted with him.
OBJECTION - Relevance
Plaintiff has resorted to calling every single member of the department, whether ever even having an interaction with him or not, as witnesses. Defense requests that it be ordered that plaintiff's witness list be consolidated, or that the specific relevance of every...
Objection - Relevance
Evidence piece P-009 is not relevant to this case. This case is not dealing with the similarity of houses, nor anyone saying hello, or other random messages. The defense therefore moves that it be stricken and the plaintiff be sanctioned.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS
The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, alleges:
1. The plaintiff, Munkler, failed to prove that they exhausted all means of resolving the charge with the DHS before filing a...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Reconsider
Regardless of the relevance, this is an extremely important point of law to rule upon nonetheless. I especially ask you to reconsider seeing as the objection was hastily ruled upon with no response from opposing counsel...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.