Recent content by AmityBlamity

  1. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    Your Honor, respectfully requesting a 48 hour extension as we're still discussing a plea deal.
  2. A

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Breach of Procedure Plaintiff failed to ask the questions in the allotted time.
  3. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    Apologies, Your Honor. I revoke my initial opposition. The prosecution agrees to the extension. In addition, we are currently in the process of negotiating a plea deal. We will keep the court informed with any future developments.
  4. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    Witness List: Roryyy___ 1950minecrafter RaiTheGuy07 pricelessAgari
  5. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    Your Honor, we still have a pending emergency injunction.
  6. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    The issue relates to a potentially massive Conflict of Interest posed by allowing Mezimori to represent the defendant.
  7. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    Your Honour, I'd like to request a side bar.
  8. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    In the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont Breach of Procedure Your Honors, I'm sure you're just as fed up as I am with these childish interruptions. The Deputy Speaker absolutely should know better, and yet he's seen fit to make a circus of these proceedings. I move he be charged with...
  9. A

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Breach of Procedure Per Rule 6.6 (Response Times), Plaintiff has 24 hours to respond to an Objection. It has been 17 days since I made the Objection. I move to strike the response.
  10. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Breach of Procedure Your Honors, none of these people have been summoned to speak, nor are they here to offer Amicus Briefs. Rather, they have seen fit to cause chaos in the court. I find it especially concerning that supporters of the accused...
  11. A

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Due to the severity of the defendant’s crimes, we request that the court remove v__d from his positions as both the Head of Urban Development and General of the Oakridge Military, and appoint a caretaker in his stead...
  12. A

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Thank you, Your Honour. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT AMICUS BRIEF Ladies, gentlemen, enbies, and others. Since former Justice Nacho's ruling in StressedGV v. SalsaStar [2022] FCR 52, a precedent has been set that deported players do not have the same rights as citizens...
  13. A

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Your Honour, I wish to file an Amicus Brief regarding the defendant's lack of rights to representation.
Back
Top