Recent content by ColonelKai

Approved.

My condolences, The charge is to be removed. You have 48 hours to respond to all pending questions.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT xEndeavour v. UnityMaster [2025] FCR 25 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The plaintiff claims that the original case is frivolous as it "not only lacks any legal standing or merit, but also represents a deliberate abuse of the legal...

@Pepecuu and @Boomsides are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 as witnesses.

You may.

The court thanks both parties for their opening statements. For clarification, the plaintiff has listed within their parties list the Department of Justice as a witness in parenthesis. Does this mean they wish to call upon them during witness examinations?

Hello, and good afternoon. I would like to preface this post with an apology. Due to the limited amount of time (usually being exaughsted when doing so), I have hugely confused some matters at hand in this case, where I did not realise the below motion was for the 3 images (screenshots of the...

Approved.

To make it clear - sorry, when you said Dartanboy, I didnt check the name, and just stated it being true. The above quoted piece is the ONLY piece of evidence declared inadmissible and struck from the court.

The defendant has 48 hours for their opening statement.

Upon reconsideration, this motion is approved. Further, the court hereby issues a Sua sponte dismissal on the grounds that the public defender issues by the Public Defender Programme has failed to meet their bar for competency, fundamentally disturbing and damaging the integrity of the case in...

Motion denied. There is no reason why this evidence could not have been submitted any earlier during Discovery, unless the defendant can justify.

Yes, of course.

The defendant has 72 hours for their opening statement.

Very well, the court will go into recess pending a verdict.