Recent content by Dartanboy

May we respond to this ridiculous motion, your honor?

I am present on behalf of v__d.

BREACH OF PROCEDURE While it is standard practice for the courts to ask clarifying questions, never has it been done, as far as I am aware, in Redmont's 5-year history that the courts have required new evidence to be submitted. Furthermore, even if it was, certainly after Closing Statememts is...

Your honor, given that this Appeal has been moved to the Archive, I request clarification on whether the above motion is being considered.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Introduction This case is simple, and so shall this Closing Statement be. The Plaintiff requires long drawn-out filings in an effort to warp reality to fit their narrative, but the Facts tell a short and simple story where...

PERJURY We provided the date of February 27, 2025 and this is shown in Exhibit P-008.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honors, in this appeal, Justice Compass Law Firm was representing itself - not the Plaintiff of FCR 26, as such we have no standing to even file an appeal for the case as a whole, let alone have it accepted. As seen...

Furthermore, your honors, the case of FCR 26 was not appealed.

Your honor, as mentioned in the original filing, I am representing Justice Compass, Ltd. - not MysticPhunky. I don't understand how we could file this case?

Your honor, we ask for clarification: Only the countersuit was appealed, not the entire case. What is expected to be refiled?

Username: Dartanboy I am representing a client Who is your Client?: Justice Compass, Ltd. (I am the CEO - This is my proof of representation) What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 26 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26 Basis for...

Your honor, I will very busy this weekend, could I get a 24 hour extension?

Justice Compass Law Firm will be representing YeetGlazer. Note, it may not be me directly, but an employee of the law firm.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Introduction The Defendant, Naezaratheus, is a fraudster who intentionally and maliciously tricked the Plaintiff, Vanguard & Co, into paying him more than $9.3 Million through a series of fraudulent stock trades, and...

Your Honor, Throughout the course of this case, the question at hand has been simple: did the murder of the Plaintiff by the Defendant cause harm beyond the scope of a normal murder? The answer to that very question is also simple: Yes. By killing the Plaintiff, the Defendant produced a crime...