Recent content by dodrio3

  1. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Dismissed _lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11 v. BrustkleFurry [2024] DCR 44

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT The Defence contends that the Plaintiff is demanding an excessive amount of compensation for an incident that lasted just over one minute. The amount sought is disproportionately high and exceeds reasonable limits, given...
  2. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Dismissed _lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11 v. BrustkleFurry [2024] DCR 44

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER 1. Your honour with respect you statement of "It would be highly hypocritical to grant your 72 hour extension earlier in this trial and turn around and deny the Defence's extension.". Is completely false my request for an...
  3. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Dismissed _lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11 v. BrustkleFurry [2024] DCR 44

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE You honour the defence was give a strict timeline of 72h to post their opening statement or request and extension and this timeframe has been breached. I wish for us to move on due to my clients right to a fair...
  4. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Dismissed totemundying v. Virtus Group [2024] FCR 122

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECUSE The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The Judicial officer overseeing this case has taken over 7 weeks to give a veridic on this case thus I ask the...
  5. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Dismissed _lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11 v. BrustkleFurry [2024] DCR 44

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT _lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11 Plaintiff v. BrustkleFurry Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defence Affirms All facts. II. DEFENCES The Defence contends that the Plaintiff is demanding an excessive amount of...
  6. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Jeygame7816 v. Destined7433 [2024] FCR 125

    Edited to fix the formation of the closing []
  7. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Jeygame7816 v. Destined7433 [2024] FCR 125

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honour, In this matter, it is evident that the defendant has indeed breached the plaintiff's attorney-client privileges, which remain active. According to the Legal Reform Act, “Attorney-Client Privilege shall exist as soon as a client...
  8. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    As per the first point I have been busy with a funeral of a close family member so I have not had time to post some pictures for a video game. I will post them shortly. For the second point the defence is only arguing that one claiming that no emotional distress was taken upon and fails to...
  9. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Jeygame7816 v. Destined7433 [2024] FCR 125

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE Your honour it is not the job of a witness to describe what evidence has been presented into to case by an attorney.
  10. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Jeygame7816 v. Destined7433 [2024] FCR 125

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE You honour the defence was give a strict timeline of 24h to post followup questions and this timeframe has been breached. I wish for us to move on due to my clients right to a fair and speedy trial.
  11. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Dismissed _lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11 v. BrustkleFurry [2024] DCR 44

    I wish to request a 72h extensions as I am attending today.
  12. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Jeygame7816 v. Destined7433 [2024] FCR 125

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - LEADING QUESTION Your honour questions 4 though 6 all wish to clarify something that has to have already been in the case. The defence is only wishing to confirm with a witness that certain evidence they see as important was or...
  13. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Jeygame7816 v. Destined7433 [2024] FCR 125

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE Your honour questions question 3 is not relevant as the time frame of the plaintiff seeking legal counsel does not affect the facts of this case or have any relevance as my client had a right to legal counsel.
  14. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Marissa4 v. SplashyBoi74 [2024] DCR 42

    Motion IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECOSIDER Your Honour their is no evidence of D-19 the defence has based their motion to dismiss upon. This is ether because they are in competent of court and deleted the entry or because they ever provided this in the first...
Back
Top