Recent content by Nacho

  1. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    I will be denying the motion to reconsider, by extension, the request to strike the testimony as well. While I do see your perspective on the question, I also see that it is still based on the facts and not fully opinionated.
  2. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Snow_crp v. AndreaSP15 [ 2024] FCR 43

    Ok, I appreciate it the forums account and Minecraft account was not matching the name properly. I appreciate the correction.
  3. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanboy v. Robert [2024] DCR 9

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Dartanboy v. Robert [2024] DCR 9 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Robert committed unconsented assault 2. A free society has no assault. II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION 1. "I didn't do it" 2. Robert is blind 3. Robert was defending himself...
  4. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    I will allow the plaintiff to respond to this motion if the plaintiff doesn't respond within 24 hours. I will consider the matter settled and decide on the motion. As the Plaintiff has indicated, they don't have any more questions at this time; we will move into closing statements by the...
  5. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Snow_crp v. AndreaSP15 [ 2024] FCR 43

    For what is your purpose of responding to the case? As you are not listed on my witness list...
  6. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Snow_crp v. AndreaSP15 [ 2024] FCR 43

    I would first like to apologize for the mistyped messages; I had the wrong case record pulled on my screen, indicating a pending answer to the complaint. I have removed the messages accordingly so as not to confuse either party. The charges regarding the mistyped messages will not be actioned or...
  7. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    Customarily we don't normally allow rebuttals to respond to objections. In the future I will consider the option for rebuttals of responses.
  8. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    As the plaintiff did, in fact, reword the question(s), and it does appear in this instance to simply provide context, I will overrule the objection.
  9. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Morgan, Sheraton, & Co. v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 34

    1. We checked the player account, as it was not indicated that it was being sourced from an alternative account. So we ran /bal. 2. There was at the time; however, I would have to see if I still have the picture that was taken as it has been some time since the report that I...
  10. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session The Commonwealth of Redmont v. The Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 45

    I am extremely disappointed that it had to get to this point. If neither side objects, I will award both parties the opportunity to present their opening statements to the case. The Plaintiff can present their opening statement within the next 48 hours.
  11. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Morgan, Sheraton, & Co. v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 34

    Gotcha... 1. In that context, yes, it doesn't appear so.
  12. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Morgan, Sheraton, & Co. v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 34

    1. Which records are you quoting? You didn't submit them within your question.
  13. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Morgan, Sheraton, & Co. v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 34

    1. You just changed the question... But I am not sure of the exact time frame. I recall that we paused it within 10 minutes of getting the report.
  14. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Morgan, Sheraton, & Co. v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 34

    1. The Department paused the auction when the report was filed and began our review.
Back
Top