A
BILL
To
Amend the Judicial Standards Act to Change Warrant Requirements
The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following...
A
BILL
TO
Amend the Miscellaneous Offences Act
1 - Short Title and Enactment
(1) This Act may be cited as the ‘Enslavement Definition Overhaul Act' or the ‘EDO Act’
(2) This Act shall be enacted immediately upon its signage.
(3) This Act has been authored by: Rep. Pepecuu
(4) This Act has been...
As the Court clerk, I would like to remind the people above who are not parties to the lawsuit, to refrain from further discussions (unless filing an amicus brief or an action that directly affects the proceedings of this case), as there are appropriate channels to discuss this in the DC discord...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
May it please the Court,
Your Honor, opposing counsel, and all present today, this is a clear violation of property rights and individual safety in Redmont. On 19th January 2025, the Defendant unlawfully broke into the...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION
Given that the Presiding Judicial Officer (Magistrate Mask3D_WOLF) has rejected the motion to recuse, under §16.3 of the 'Judicial Standards Act', it is stated:
Therefore in accordance with this Act of...
The Plaintiff's legal counsel would also like to respectfully remind your honor that they have not ruled on the Objection of Perjury made by the Plaintiff against the Defendant 5 calendar days ago, where the Defendant has made their reply to the objection, as seen above.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECUSE
Your Honor,
Given the multiple instances in which you have interrogated the witness with a line of questioning that can only be done by the defendant during their cross-examination, and the fact that you have COMPLETELY and UNILATERALLY struck...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Your Honor,
You have given no prior warnings to the witness for their actions, not even holding them in contempt for the lack of response from the witness (as demonstrated in GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 11, to...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY
The Defendant incorrectly stated to the witness in Question 3 that “You previously confirmed your tenancy on plot wl-f086 on January 19th 2025”. However the witness clearly stated that he did not rent the plot, stating...
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff's Legal Counsel was not given a chance to respond to the objection. The plaintiff's legal counsel is allowed up to 24 hours to respond to the objection, according to the Courts Guide to Objections, under "Answer to the Objection".
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.