Your honor, he have only been made aware by our client of a conversation that Alex initiated with Vernicia on 5/10.
In the the conversation Alex attempts to disrupt the court proceedings by going around the plaintiffs lawyers. He claimed that he had spoke with the plaintiffs team, however he...
Your honor, I would like to strike Alex's "remarks" in the second paragraph. His remarks are outside the scope of the question and speculative. Alex is not a professional witness on the subject of the plaintiffs organizations and their dealings. The witness is giving testimony that does not...
Plaintiff exhibit C, shows a conversation between yourself and Olisaurus. In your conversation at lemonade, you said this, “Id like these shulkers full of items taken down as it is my system.” You said yourself that Lemonade had limited trade in the shulker industry. If your goal was to...
Alex, you mentioned in your testimony that you know that the selling of shulker boxes has had a place in DC trading for a long time, that you had purchased shulker boxes filled with items. Did you create the trademark to prevent Lemonade and VernicaS from increasing their shulker sales?
Your honor, throughout these proceedings the defense has not been able to disprove that the DEC is responsible for the existing trademark. They have spent much of their arguments against the amounts requested in the prayers for relief. As the plaintiff has tried to cling closer to the facts and...
I still object on relevance. Lemonade Co has multiple sub shops under it’s administration. Whether or not some of the subsidiaries have closed has no bearing on the trademark issue. Nor does it relate to the damages caused to the shulker industry.
Your honor, I apologize , I misworded my objection to Trent's second question. The proper objection would be on the grounds of Improper Evidence. as there is no context.
Objections
Claxx and KeyBoardAlex
Objection on ground of relevance, whether or not the lemonade shop was temporarily closed does not address or pertain to TheHoardCo trademarking a “system” that does not belong to them.
Objection on grounds of speculation, the witness cannot answer a question...
Opening Statement
Your honor,
On May 1st, TheHoardCo filed a request on the DEC forum for a Trademark of “Shulker Systems” The Secretary of the Department of Education and Commerce Trentrick_Lamar posted a reply to the request stating “Accepted Your trademark now has official recognition and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.