Recent content by Vernicia

  1. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE Justification for Motion The Defendant respectfully moves this Court to strike all instances of the word "fraud" (or variations thereof) as used by the Plaintiff, Dartanboy, in the case of Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus. The...
  2. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, The Plaintiff's case against the Defendant rests upon two critical claims: breach of contract and fraud. However, when we examine their own documentation and the applicable laws of the Commonwealth, it becomes...
  3. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    During lawsuite filling and this date , it was sold to Stoppers , i am adding screenshot to support this development
  4. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    Vanguard Securities LLC is by our information managed and owned by Nexalin
  5. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    We wish to ask for 72 hour extension for discovery , I was busy during the week and i lost one of my lawiers that was solving the cases during the week.
  6. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLEA The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. V__D (Mezimoří representing) Defendant I. PLEA The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on the charge of Corruption. The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on Nine charges counts of Incitement. The...
  7. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, Throughout this proceeding, the plaintiff has failed to meet the fundamental burden of proof required in civil cases. While attempting to secure a substantial judgment of $65,000, the plaintiff has presented only...
  8. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Breach of Procedure Responses to responses are not permitted.
  9. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, the defense apologizes for the confusion. The defense concurs that the use of the word "in-game" is a mischaracterization of what actually happened, and consents to that word being struck or amended from the answer to complaint. Nevertheless, the defense's...
  10. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, the defense apologizes for the confusion. The defense concurs that the use of the word "in-game" is a mischaracterization of what actually happened, and consents to that word being struck or amended from the answer to complaint. Nevertheless, the defense's...
  11. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Vanguard & Co Plaintiff v. Naezaratheus Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defendant AFFIRMS paragraph 1 of the complaint regarding the Plaintiff and Defendant. 2. The Defendant DENIES the general allegations...
  12. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Your Honor, I respectfully request a 24-hour extension. I got confused by active motion and Amicus Briefs and assumed deadline is standart 72 hours not 48 hours. We will post answer to complaint ASAP
  13. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Clearly, he was not deported when you wrote the objection making this a Perjury.
  14. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Perjury Your Honor, opposing counsel has knowingly misrepresented the facts under oath by falsely claiming that Mr. Naez is deported. This is demonstrably untrue, and I am submitting evidence confirming that my client remains in the country. We move to strike this false assertion from the...
  15. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Breach of Procedure Your Honor, the defendant is not deported. Moreover, the purpose of an amicus brief is to offer the Court impartial analysis from interested third parties regarding the facts and legal claims at issue. Instead, the author has chosen to focus on court procedure and advocate...
Back
Top