Appeal: Accepted [2025] FCR 26 - Countersuit Verdict Appeal

Dartanboy

Dartanboy

Citizen
Supporter
3rd Anniversary Change Maker Popular in the Polls Legal Eagle
Dartanboy
Dartanboy
Attorney
Joined
May 10, 2022
Messages
1,508
Username: Dartanboy

I am representing a client

Who is your Client?: Justice Compass, Ltd. (I am the CEO - This is my proof of representation)

What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 26

Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

Basis for Appeal: The Defendant filed a countersuit alleging a Frivolous Case, and lost the countersuit.

The Legal Damages Act (Act of Congress - Legal Damages Act.) stipulates:

"(a) Legal fees are awarded directly to the legal representative of the party that prevails in a given case, paid by the losing party in the case. Legal fees must be awarded unless excepted by this law, and do not necessitate inclusion in a prayer for relief or a countersuit to be awarded." and
"(c) Legal fees shall be awarded to the legal representative of the prevailing party in a case at a rate of the greater of $6,000 Redmont dollars or 30% of the total value of the case. Cases that reach summary judgment or default judgment before any witnesses are examined shall have an award of the greater of $5,000 or 25% of the total value of the case.
(i) In civil cases, the value of a case shall be assessed as either the award actually granted if the plaintiff prevails, or the award requested by the plaintiff if the defendant prevails."

As countersuits are explicitly mentioned in the law and are considered a separate case, and even received a separate verdict in FCR 26 (and legal fees are not necessitated to be present in the Prayer for Relief) legal fees should be awarded for to the prevailing party of the countersuit in addition to the legal fees awarded for the initial lawsuit.

As such, Justice Compass, Ltd. is entitled $6,000 in Legal Fees for the countersuit, in addition to the legal fees already awarded.

Supporting Evidence:
 
After a 2-0 vote the Supreme Court has voted to accept the appeal and reverse the original verdict. The plaintiff may refile the case in the Supreme Court. The original verdict will not be enforced pending the outcome of the retrial.
 
Aladeen said:
After a 2-0 vote the Supreme Court has voted to accept the appeal and reverse the original verdict. The plaintiff may refile the case in the Supreme Court. The original verdict will not be enforced pending the outcome of the retrial.
Click to expand...
Your honor, we ask for clarification:

Only the countersuit was appealed, not the entire case. What is expected to be refiled?
 
The entire case.
 
Matthew100x said:
The entire case.
Click to expand...
Your honor, as mentioned in the original filing, I am representing Justice Compass, Ltd. - not MysticPhunky.

I don't understand how we could file this case?
 
Furthermore, your honors, the case of FCR 26 was not appealed.
 
The case is very clearly being appealed counselor. Your Firm posted an appeal on FCR 26. We see issues with the case. Thus we want to review the entire matter. You have now been instructed twice to repost the case to the SCR.
 
Matthew100x said:
The case is very clearly being appealed counselor. Your Court posting an appeal on FCR 26. We see issues with the case. Thus we want to review the entire matter. You have now been instructed twice to repost the case to the SCR.
Click to expand...

Motion


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your honors, in this appeal, Justice Compass Law Firm was representing itself - not the Plaintiff of FCR 26, as such we have no standing to even file an appeal for the case as a whole, let alone have it accepted.

As seen in many Appeals before, it is common to appeal a decision, such as a Contempt charge, without appealing the case as a whole.

Whether the Supreme Court sees issues with the case as a whole is irrelevant, as the case was not appealed and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over this matter.

It is clear in the original appeal filing that this appeal is for the countersuit, and the countersuit alone.

The following actions are prohibited by the Constitution and Common Law:

  • Forcing an un-appealed decision and case to be overturned, stayed, or otherwise affected by a separate appeal.
  • Forcing an individual to be represented by a law firm who appealed a separate case than the one the Court seeks to have refiled.

The Supreme Court simply does not have the power to make such requirements. The Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction over this case, as only the countersuit (which is legally a separate case) was appealed.

 
Your honor, given that this Appeal has been moved to the Archive, I request clarification on whether the above motion is being considered.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top