Lawsuit: Adjourned funyolk Vs. gsse [2024] DCR 13

Status
Not open for further replies.
funyolk

funyolk

Citizen
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
4th Anniversary 2nd Anniversary Change Maker Popular in the Polls 1st Anniversary
funyolk
funyolk
donator3
Joined
Mar 29, 2021
Messages
238
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


funyolk
Plaintiff

v.

gsse
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The defendant violated the contract agreed to upon renting an apartment by making major changes to the apartment.




I. PARTIES
1. funyolk
2. gsse

II. FACTS
1. gsse rented an apartment
2. By renting an apartment, he agreed to the condition that he would not change anything
3. As you can see from the evidence, and the model apartment(last file), changes were made

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The plaintiff seeks relief due to the effort required to decorate the apartment, along with the fact that the contract was agreed upon renting

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $500

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 7th day of April 2024
 

Attachments

  • evidence1.PNG
    evidence1.PNG
    178.2 KB · Views: 68
  • evidence3.PNG
    evidence3.PNG
    109.9 KB · Views: 66
  • evidence2.PNG
    evidence2.PNG
    182.6 KB · Views: 67
  • evidence4.PNG
    evidence4.PNG
    152 KB · Views: 66
Because the Defendant does not have a forums account, and is not in the discord, this case automatically goes to Public Defender. The court will be in recess until one is assigned.
 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT​


funyold
Plaintiff

v.

gsse
Defendant
(Represented by the Public Defender Programme)

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. We affirm that "gsse rented an apartment".
2. We dispute that "By renting an apartment, he agreed to the condition that he would not change anything".
3. We neither affirm or dispute that "As you can see from the evidence, and the model apartment(last file), changes were made"

II. DEFENCES
1. The defence wishes to make its argument around the specifics of what is counted a valid contract, as well as the validity of some of the claims brought forward by the plaintiff.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 12 of May, 2024.
 
We will now be moving onto opening statements, the plaintiff has 48 hours to post their opening statements.
 
As the plaintiff has failed to request an extension, and has failed to provide their opening statements by almost 3 days, we will now be moving onto the defendants opening statements, they shall have 48 hours to provide their opening statment..

Further more, I find the Plaintiff in contempt of court and order the DOJ to fine them appropriately.
 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Opening Statement​

Good Afternoon,

I would like to directly address the two claims for relief made by the plaintiff in a combined manner.

The plaintiff seeks relief due to the effort required to decorate the apartment, along with the fact that the contract was agreed upon renting
Click to expand...

This can be split up into the two individual components;
a) Agreement being made upon renting
b) Effort required to decorate the apartment


a) Agreement being made upon renting
The defence assumes, from the prayer for relief and the evidence provided, that the "contract" as referred to in the claims for relief is the signage posted at the wall as can be seen in the first exhibit titled "evidence1". While it is unknown whether or not the start of the renting period (and thus the alleged time of when the "contract" would have been signed) is unclear, both under the Contracts Act, and the FCL, the argument stands. Namely, the fact that a simple signage on a wall does not constitute a contract. The sign does not convey any form of transaction, nor has it been proven that the defendant has reasonably seen the sign, processed it and taken it in as a contract, a legally binding one. The sign therefore, does not satisfy offer, consideration, acceptance or intent requirements of a contract.
​

b) Effort required to decorate the apartment
While the above argument alone should be enough, as the defendant is under no obligation to be compensating the plaintiff for their business expenses, it is also a weird claim at best and a malicious one at worst as when looked at the last exhibit "evidence4.png", there is no decor to be seen, and even worse, there are heads lined up on the wall, in a strikingly similar fashion to the defendants situation.
​


In conclusion, the evidence provided and the circumstances surrounding do not satisfy the requirements for the claims made.​
 
I seem to have made a mistake, I accidently messed up the order of court proceedings and skipped discovery. With that said to correct my error we will now be in discovery for 7 days, if either party would like to request an extension to discovery or to end it early, please motion to do so.
 
As the 7 days has passed and no one has submitted any witnesses or evidence, we will now be moving into closing statements, the plaintiff has 72 hours to post theirs.
 
We will now be moving onto the Defendant's Opening statements, they have 72 hours.


I hereby find Funyolk in contempt of court and order the DOJ to fine him appropriately.
 
By Opening I mean Closing*
 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Closing Statement​

We have no further arguments to make your honour. We rest our case.
 
We will now be in recess pending a verdict.
 

Verdict


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT
funyolk v. gsse [2024] DCR 13

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant rented an apartment in his building. By renting said apartment, he agreed not to change it. As seen in evidence filed, the appearance at the time of filing was changed, you can see the difference based off of a model apartment.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. Affirms apartment was rented by the Defendant, denied that renting said apartment suffices as agreement, neither affirms or disputes that changes were made.

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. First I will be covering the claim that the Apartment was Modified, the plaintiff has failed to provide screenshots proving that it was modified, even though he did provide a screenshot of a Model Apartment, this apartment is not the same as the one the defendant rented. Therefore we can not reasonably determine the starting appearance of the apartment.
2. As the Defendant's counsel pointed out, it has not been made clear by evidence submitted in the trial whether or not the sign was there before the defendant rented the apartment.
3. I will now break down whether or not the contract is valid based off of the Contracts Act
I. Offer: I believe the proposed contract does not meet this standard, the posted sign does not have any sort of "By Renting this you agree to..." instead it just says doing something will result in something, it's a statement, not a question, and the most common definition of an offer would be presenting something to someone, for acceptance, and the message does not present something at all.
II. Acceptance: I also do not believe it meets this standard, as there is no "if" or like I said earlier, question. like "By Renting this you agree to"
III. Intent: I believe it does show this, with the part about the fine.
IV. Capacity: It is in my opinion both parties have the capacity.
As not all terms have been met, this contract is not valid.

IV. DECISION
1. I hereby find in favor of the defendant.

The District Court thanks all involved.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top