Lawsuit: Pending _lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11 v. BrustkleFurry [2024] DCR 44

zLost

Citizen
Representative
Public Affairs Department
Education Department
3rd Anniversary Grave Digger Change Maker Popular in the Polls
zLost
zLost
representative
Joined
Jul 17, 2020
Messages
591

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


_lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11
Plaintiff

v.

BrustkleFurry
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant, BrustkleFurry, has trespassed and attempted to kill the Plaintiff multiple times in their own property. The Defendant had been asked multiple times to leave, yet refused to and kept trying to kill the Plaintiff and causing mayhem in their store. The Defendant has physically harmed the Plaintiff by causing them to bleed, has psychologically harmed the Plaintiff through harassment, and has repelled customers away from the Plaintiff's store due to the attempted murders.

I. PARTIES
1. _lucaaa_
2. lukeyyy11
3. BrustkleFurry

II. FACTS
1. On November 9th 2024, the Defendant entered the Plaintiff's store despite there being a sign stating that they are banned from the shop. (Exhibit A)
2. When informed to leave, the Defendant refused to and stayed inside the store, while trying to shoot the Plaintiff and caused them to bleed. (Exhibit B)
3. The Defendant then attempted to murder the Plaintiff again, this time using a shovel and almost killing them. (Exhibit B)
4. The Defendant proceeded to hide on the 2nd floor, after a friend of the Plaintiff and one of the owners of the store, RoryyyMC started attacking them back in defense. (Exhibit B)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Punitive Damages, as stated in the Legal Damages Act (link), are:

“Punitive damages” are damages awarded against a person to punish them for their outrageous conduct and to deter them and others like them from similar conduct in the future

What the Defendant did is clearly outrageous. They trespassed, attempted murder, and caused chaos in the Plaintiff's store. This conduct is unacceptable, and should not be left without a large punishment.
2. Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont, as stated in the Legal Damages Act (link), is said to be:

situations in which an injured party loses their ability to engage in certain activities in the way that the injured party did before the harm.

The Plaintiff lost the ability to maintain their store and handle it's day-to-day operations. The Defendant caused chaos in their. Gunshots could be heard from outside the shop, deterring any potential customers that were around the store.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The Plaintiff is seeking $15,000 in Punitive Damages due to the severity of the actions.
2. The Plaintiff is seeking $10,000 in Consequential Damages due to the loss of enjoyment in Redmont.
3. The Plaintiff seeks 20% of the case value ($5,000) in Legal Fees.



By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 16th day of November 2024

 

Writ of Summons


@brustklefurry is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of _lucaaa_ and lukeyyy11 v. brustklefurry [2024] DCR 44

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
The Defence is present and will be being represented by Titan Law.
 

Attachments

  • 1731969721847.png
    1731969721847.png
    55.8 KB · Views: 6
I apologize your honor, I forgot to attach proof of representation.

1731920974954.png

1731920994514.png
 
We will now be entering discovery, discovery will last 72 hours.
 
Back
Top