Lawsuit: Dismissed MikeOxlonger1 v. Philip_d_blank [2025] DCR 9

Status
Not open for further replies.
Babysoga4real

Babysoga4real

Senior Citizen
Public Affairs Department
Construction & Transport Department
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
Event Designer
Popular in the Polls
BabySoga
BabySoga
Event Designer
Joined
Aug 16, 2023
Messages
311
'''



Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


(MikeOxlonger1) [represented by me]
Plaintiff

v.

(Phillip_d_blank)
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF


I. PARTIES
1. MikeOxlonger1
2. Phillip_d_blank

II. FACTS
1. On the 20th of January 2025 the Defendant lost a Drill.
2. The Drill was rented out to him by MikeOxlonger1 the Plaintiff.
3. He had also signed a Contract with MikeOxlonger1 which said he(Defendant) must give another Drill of equal Value if the Defendant loses it.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. 10,000$ or a Drill for losing the Drill due to the Defendant signing a Contract.
2. 1,520$ for missing Rent as the Defendant hasn't paid rent since he lost thou he is required to.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. 10,000 for the Drill
2. 1,520 for missing and unpaid rent.
3. 5,000 Emotional Damages

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This (20) day of (January) (2025)

 

Attachments

  • goldrilllawsuit1-1.png
    goldrilllawsuit1-1.png
    60.5 KB · Views: 68
  • DrillSuit3-1.png
    DrillSuit3-1.png
    69.2 KB · Views: 70
  • Screenshot_20250124_090829_Discord.jpg
    Screenshot_20250124_090829_Discord.jpg
    29.5 KB · Views: 65
Proof of Representation if the one before want enough.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250124_091329_Discord.jpg
    Screenshot_20250124_091329_Discord.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 52

Writ of Summons


@Philip_d_blank is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Mikeoxlonger1 v. Philip_d_blank [2025] DCR 9

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
damn did he do that fr? thats crazy
 
cheetahracer1 said:
damn did he do that fr? thats crazy
Click to expand...

Your Honor,
We can't have random people talking in Court the Plaintiff wishes that the Court find them in Contempt.
 
your honor who is CheetahRacer1 and also what does contempt mean?
 
cheetahracer1 said:
your honor who is CheetahRacer1 and also what does contempt mean?
Click to expand...
cheetahracer1 is hereby charged with contempt of court again.

Please do not flood a court case in which you have no business being a part of.
 
I am mike, I would like speak, Id like to add that the last rent payment was paid 2/19/25 also that would be 3800 of unpaid rent for 11 days unpaid, also the iron drill value was 15000 at the time before it was devalued when hed recived the drill the first time
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kartar1 said:
I am mike, I would like speak, Id like to add that the last rent payment was paid 2/19/25 also that would be 3800 of unpaid rent for 11 days unpaid, also the iron drill value was 15000 at the time before it was devalued when hed recived the drill the first time
Click to expand...
Unless you are now representing yourself, please have your lawyer communicate information like this during the case.

This comment is being struck for being out of turn.
 
The Plaintiff would like speak as it is discovery, Wed like to add that the last rent payment was paid 2/19/25 also that would be 3800 of unpaid rent for 11 days unpaid, also the iron drill value was 15000 at the time before it was devalued when hed recived the drill the first time. Your Honor I am Still the Representative of MikeOxlonger1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Babysoga4real said:
The Plaintiff would like speak as it is discovery, Wed like to add that the last rent payment was paid 2/19/25 also that would be 3800 of unpaid rent for 11 days unpaid, also the iron drill value was 15000 at the time before it was devalued when hed recived the drill the first time. Your Honor I am Still the Representative of MikeOxlonger1.
Click to expand...
Discovery isnt the time to be making arguments. If you would like to amend your complaint, I am allowing you to do so but this comment is being struck.


As the plaintiff didnt appear, I will be contacting a PD shortly.
 
ko531 said:
Discovery isnt the time to be making arguments. If you would like to amend your complaint, I am allowing you to do so but this comment is being struck.


As the plaintiff didnt appear, I will be contacting a PD shortly.
Click to expand...
Your Honor,
We request a Verdict now the PD Programm has shown they cannot provide a PD.
 
Babysoga4real said:
Your Honor,
We request a Verdict now the PD Programm has shown they cannot provide a PD.
Click to expand...
The inability to provide a PD does not circumvent the right to have one. I also find it troubling that you are using insider information from your PD perms to try and benefit your case.

Motion for summary judgement is denied
 
ko531 said:
The inability to provide a PD does not circumvent the right to have one. I also find it troubling that you are using insider information from your PD perms to try and benefit your case.

Motion for summary judgement is denied
Click to expand...
Your Honor,
I never said anything that is classified by PD Programm. If you wanted to Contact a PD 10 days ago and Still havent I have estimated that none has been found.
 
Permission to speak as the Director of the Public Defense office, your honor?
 
Good afternoon honor and may it please the court,
Your honor, public defender has been assigned to all requested cases, and will make himself present shortly. We'd also like to make it clear to the plaintiff that the Public Defense office is more than capable of providing public defenders to our courts, and that a public defender had, in fact, been assigned to the "10 day" case that the plaintiff was referencing. We apologize to the court for that attorney's incompetency, and the attorney in question has been dismissed from the Public Defense Office. It is the hope of our office that the plaintiff exercise restraint in its future remarks, and that the plaintiff ensure that statements they make before the court are fully informed.
Thank you for your time,
 
Your honor, I have been assigned as the public defender for this case.

I would like to request a 24 hour period to allow an answer to the complaint.

Attached is proof of representation.

Thank you.

1739134973389.png
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Court Rules and Procedures 5.12

Under Rule 5.12 (Lack of Personal Jurisdiction) 'the plaintiff fails to have sufficient standing in order to pursue the case.'

The plaintiff MikeOxlonger1 a.k.a LiveLaughToaster, has since been permanently deported since this case was filled. They no longer have standing within this court as they cannot participate in Redmont activities.

We can see this line specifically in this [Appeal Request 2023 SCR 2]

The idea that deported players have no rights within Redmont is a long upheld decision within the courts. In Ligthiago v. FuriousPaladin [2023 FCR 79] we see that the Judge had been informed of a deported players lack of right to representation.

We also see this in the appeal REALTV4968 v. Staff Team where a deported player attempts to represent themselves and is disallowed from doing so by staff, and is also reiterated here in gsse v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024 FCR 101] by Judge Duke that deported players have no rights.

Most recently this supreme court decision upholds previous determinations that "Deported players have no rights in our nation", UnityMaster v. lcn [2025 SCR 2]

 
I am granting this motion to dismiss. The Plaintiff in this case has been deported and therefore does not have any legal standing. There is no world in which this case could continue in its current state.


The District Court thanks all parties involved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top