Lawsuit: In Session Dearev v. Plura72 and Alexandrian News [2025] DCR 14

1. State your name for the record please
2. Have you seen the symbols message?
3. Have you seen the defamatory message? (P-003)
4. Where were the messages posted at?
5. What was your reaction opon seeing the defamatory message?
6. Before the article was posted, did you ever heard any acusations of me being a 'scammer'?
7. Have you heard anyone talking about this article after it was posted?
Thank you.
 
3. Have you seen the defamatory message? (P-003)

Objection


Assumes facts not in evidence, leading question

No messages have been established to be defamatory, despite what the plaintiff alleges.



7. Have you heard anyone talking about this article after it was posted?

Objection


Ambiguous, compound question

Which article? There are two articles being discussed. If the plaintiff is asking about both, then this is a compound question.

 

Objection


Assumes facts not in evidence, leading question

No messages have been established to be defamatory, despite what the plaintiff alleges.




Objection


Ambiguous, compound question

Which article? There are two articles being discussed. If the plaintiff is asking about both, then this is a compound question.



Ambiguous, compound question

Which article? There are two articles being discussed. If the plaintiff is asking about both, then this is a compound question.

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION

Its clear that the article being referenced to is P-003.
 

Objection


Assumes facts not in evidence, leading question

No messages have been established to be defamatory, despite what the plaintiff alleges.




Objection


Ambiguous, compound question

Which article? There are two articles being discussed. If the plaintiff is asking about both, then this is a compound question.

Objection 1 (Assumes facts not in evidence, leading question)
Sustained, please rephrase the question

Objection 2 (Ambiguous, compound question)
Sustained, please rephrase the question
 
1. State your name for the record please
2. Have you seen the symbols message?
3. Have you seen the message? (P-003)
4. Where were the messages posted at?
5. What was your reaction opon seeing the article?
6. Before the articles were posted, did you ever heard any acusations of me being a 'scammer'?
7. Have you heard anyone talking about the article (P-003) after it was posted?
Thank you.
 
1. State your name for the record please
Inalite
2. Have you seen the symbols message?
Yes, I have seen the cryptic messages (and have tried reaching out to Alexandria news and Darev for a hint to decrypt them)
1739990294683.png

1739990261019.png

3. Have you seen the message? (P-003)
I have seen the message
4. Where were the messages posted at?
In the #news channel
5. What was your reaction opon seeing the article?
Reaching out to Darev for help to decrypt the messages
6. Before the articles were posted, did you ever heard any acusations of me being a 'scammer'?
No
7. Have you heard anyone talking about the article (P-003) after it was posted?
No, not that I remember, probably due to the fact that the article got deleted by staff not long after.
 
If the plaintiff doesn't have any follow up questions then the defense can cross examine.
 
Defense has 48 hours to either ask the witness questions or declare to the court that they have no questins
 
The witness is excess. We will be moving to closing statements. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to post their closing statement
 
The witness is excess. We will be moving to closing statements. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to post their closing statement
Your honor, the plaintiff requestes a 24h extension period due to personal reasons.
 
Back
Top