Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alexander P. Love

Citizen
Justice Department
Supporter
Popular in the Polls Legal Eagle Statesman Order of Redmont
AlexanderLove
AlexanderLove
State Prosecutor
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
1,388

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


AlexanderLove
Plaintiff

v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The government is illegally minting money through the creation of negative balances via government fines. This is illegal and has tangible, rippling effects throughout the economy that need to be carefully regulated and managed by the authority tasked with such a task: the Federal Reserve.

I. PARTIES
1. AlexanderLove (Plaintiff)
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant)
3. Vernicia (Witness)

II. FACTS
1. Whenever a government department fines someone an amount of money that exceeds their balance, the player is put to a negative balance and the difference between that negative balance and zero is added to the respective department's balance. Money is added to an account taken from an account that has no money in it. New money is thus minted.
2. There is no guarantee that a player with a negative balance will ever earn money to offset the minted money (and bring their balance out of the negatives).
3. Vernicia, as of March 23rd, 2025, had a balance of $-922.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. According to the Federal Reserve Act, section 6, the Federal Reserve is the sole body that determines when the government can mint funds. Therefore, whenever a department fines someone into the negatives, that department is illegally minting new money. This is mismanagement of public funds and tangibly inflates the economy.
2. The Legal Damages Act entitles the plaintiff to remedy for incalculable impact to the economy as well as the breach of trust in government as a citizen of the Commonwealth.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $25,000 in consequential damages for the worsening of an existing condition -- inflation is an existing condition that was made worse by the uncontrolled printing of money. It devalues the hard-earned dollar the plaintiff and other citizens work for.
2. $50,000 in punitive damages for the gross misconduct of the government in mishandling public funds for several years and putting people in worse economic positions while doing so. The government treasury already makes up a sizable portion of the total economy, yet they recklessly print more money.
3. $22,500 in legal fees as that is 30% of the value of this case.

V. EVIDENCE
magic bullet.png


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 24th day of March, 2025.

 
Your Honour, may it pleasure the court the Plantiff has been banned.

The Court is pleasured.

(This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as the Plaintiff has been banned.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top