Search results

  1. Matt

    Lawsuit Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01)

    I accept all of the points of your motion to dismiss, however, because I feel like it, this motion has been dismissed. I would now demand that xEndeavour or their representation provides a substantive response to this preposterous allegation.
  2. Matt

    Lawsuit Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01)

    I will begin fining people who are not involved in this case but feel the need to post. Let's keep this related to the content at hand now.
  3. Matt

    Lawsuit Icypenguin79 v. The Department of Construction and Transport [Case No. 03-2021-21-01]

    I am aware a deal has been struck. Can the Secretary please inform the court and place on the record what this deal was.
  4. Matt

    Lawsuit Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01)

    Sorry Bro this is my courtroom who gave you an invite? I find it contemptable that xEndeavore can reply to this but not reply in any substantive way to the issues before this court. I would kindly ask him and his representation to hurry tf up. At this rate, the server will not need to be...
  5. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 vs. Topte [Case No. 04-2021-09]

    Evidence in past lawsuits cannot be used in current matters where the two are not linked or have any bearing on one another. It is clear to me that spouting such a venomous personal attack against not a player, but the person behind the player, should be considered to be damage for the purpose...
  6. Matt

    Lawsuit Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01)

    I am not bound by that precedent. The individual who requested the 60 hour extension is clearly a ridiculously poor lawyer, and basically a jester. Further, the judge who presided over the case also lacked any sense of understanding when it came to simple extension requests, as can be seen here...
  7. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 vs. Topte [Case No. 04-2021-09]

    Could the plaintiff plesse provide evidence pertaining to: - Any damage caused by the comments - Further context of the message sent by the defendant Thank you.
  8. Matt

    Lawsuit Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01)

    I would ask that all members of the public not concerned in the case hold any thoughts until the defendant has replied to the summons.
  9. Matt

    Lawsuit Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01)

    I'd kindly ask Crazy_Cyro_810 to chile otherwise they'll be in contempt of court and I won't hesitate to yeet them from the server. I am seriously considering jailing you for crimes against humanity for even contemplating wearing crocs. I was almost convinced by your escalator escapade...
  10. Matt

    Lawsuit Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01)

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMONS As I am bound by precedent, the name xEndeavore must be used from now on. Failure to use this name will result in contempt of court. The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Concerned Citizens v xEndeavore. Failure...
  11. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned byeSprite v. SonalDonal [Case No. 04-2021-03-01]

    I thank the plaintiff for his patience throughout all of this. Due to the defendants actions, you have suffered a loss that must be duly compensated. As such, I order the defendant to pay: - $350 to the plaintiff for loss of revenue. Should the defendant not pay, or have enough to pay, I...
  12. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 vs. Topte [Case No. 04-2021-09]

    You may want to look at this thread: Information - Creating a Lawsuit | DemocracyCraft or alternatively, this thread: Redmont Bar Association | DemocracyCraft. The RBA's discord can be accessed in the server discord's #links channel. This should help you when making a proper submission - if...
  13. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Maxterpiece vs. Czar_Chief [Case No. 04-2021-08]

    As the defendant has not responded to my summons, I shall proceed with a default judgment. For a valid contract to be in existence, there must be four components present. Firstly, there must be an offer. Here, there has been an offer of accommodation made. Secondly, there must be an acceptance...
  14. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. SonalDonal [Case No. 04-2021-03-02]

    As the defendant has not responded to my summons, I will proceed with a default judgment. I find the defendant guilty on all counts and as such, sentence them to: - 15 minutes imprisonment (if they have already served longer than this, please let the court know ASAP). - A fine of $1000 Thank...
  15. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned byeSprite v. SonalDonal [Case No. 04-2021-03-01]

    Due to the defendant not responding to my summons, I will proceed with a default judgment. Before I do so, could the plaintiff very briefly explain how they reached the sum of $350 for damages please? Thank you.
  16. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 vs. Topte [Case No. 04-2021-09]

    I'm afraid you're going to have to elaborate. You have 48 hours to submit a proper submission, unless an extension is needed.
  17. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 vs. Topte [Case No. 04-2021-09]

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Aladeen22 v Topte. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff. I would recommend both parties to...
  18. Matt

    Information Do Not Call List

    Matt_S0
  19. Matt

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ShinHeYing vs. ValioR_1299 [Case No. 03-2021-31]

    It is important that the court only focuses on the facts in issue in this case, slander regarding the first message in evidence claiming the plaintiff is a scammer. No other messages adduced in the initial complaint are of a slanderous nature. For slander to be satisfied, on a balance of...
  20. Matt

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Maxterpiece vs. Czar_Chief [Case No. 04-2021-08]

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Maxterpiece v Czar_Chief. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.
Top