Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Commonwealth is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of xAntho_ny - [2023 FCR 51] - Expungement Request. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the...

This case is dismissed at the request of the Prosecution.

This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice at the request of the Plaintiff.

I will allow the entry of the two new pieces of evidence. A closed court channel will be created for Exhibit C of evidence. The objection for relevance is overruled, as the specifications of the charges faced by UtilitySoup1407 are of importance to this case. The request to file an amicus...

I am rejecting the motion to dismiss, for the following reasons: If an individual were filing a civil suit in response to the actions of the officer, the lawsuit would need to be directed toward the DOJ. However, because this is a criminal prosecution, the individual officer is the proper...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Defendant is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. l3afyy [2023] FCR 44. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the...

Follow-up questions to the Commonwealth: 1. I can see from the link provided that it says that party registrations are confirmed either automatically or "at leadership's discretion". What I did not see is a list of actual criteria for party registration that department leadership uses. Does a...

Follow-up questions to the Commonwealth: You have stated that policy for registration is the result of "criteria and precedent set" by previous secretaries of state. 1. Is this policy a concrete set of standards? 2. Is this policy clearly established and written down anywhere?

My questions to the Plaintiff: How would the government maintain order during elections were there no restrictions for political party registration? Would it simply be a free-for-all? Suppose I were the only one to want to form a party, and I got one friend to agree, we made a Discord server...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Dumbyhead1234 v. shadownba [2023] DCR 7 I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION 1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to a loan in which the Plaintiff provided $1,500 to the Defendant in exchange for the Defendant repaying the Plaintiff $2,200. 2. The...

If the Defendant wishes to submit chat logs I will permit additional evidence to be submitted for the next 24 hours.

Because the Prosecution has failed to respond to this case even once since the proceedings resumed approximately two weeks ago, and has made no attempt to ask for an extension or provide any explanation, I am going to accept the motion to dismiss. When the Commonwealth attempts to prosecute, it...

Additions to the amicus curiae brief will not be allowed, as it is the opinion of the court that by doing this, it could be allowing another non-party to attempt to act as an attorney for one party, responding to events in the case as opposed to the original issue.

The motion to dismiss is overruled, as there is no evidence that would suggest the chat logs are faked. This is a different set of circumstances from those in SCR 19, and will be treated differently as a result. We will now be moving onto summary judgment, as both parties have agreed. This...

The extension is granted.

In light of the amicus curiae brief, I will be overruling the objection of fruit of the poisonous tree. We will now be moving on to opening statements. The Prosecution may present their opening statements.

Does the Plaintiff wish to respond to the Motion to Dismiss?

I am overruling the objection conditionally. It is assumed that information given under a direct affirmation such as that in the screenshot is true unless proven otherwise. It would be beyond the scope of reasonable doubt to assume that someone would lie about an action taken in staff...

I will be granting the request for the amicus brief.

In the meantime, the Defense may now present their opening statements.