Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62

    RULING ON THE CLASSIFICATION Upon thorough examination and contemplation, I have reached the determination that the only evidence within the scope of the subpoena is 1 message by Justice JoeGamer. The rest of the deliberations are not available as they were most likely not kept on in the course...
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62

    The Supreme Court has decided to allow the Chief Justice to review the evidence as stated within the Classification Act. No judge may suspend a provision or parts of a provision of law without a constitutional reason. It's vital that we uphold the law and interpret the law as created by...
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF MANDAMUS Your Honor, it is imperative to emphasize that acting unilaterally against the Supreme Court raises concerns about the integrity of this process. Such actions could potentially result in a breach of integrity. Therefore, it...
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62

    Your honour, I have just been informed of this comment. However, it is not within the purview of this court to decide this matter. The president has requested the Chief Justice to decide on this issue as per the Classification Act. The Supreme Court will consider this issue and come back to you...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62

    Your honour what you are pointing to is sub-section 3 of section 10 of the Classification Act. If you want to determine if the classification is correct, I request that you open a closed court for the subpoena.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT ON THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 6 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The Chairperson of the committee placed the committee into recess without the authority to do so. 2. The chairperson of...
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62

    RESPONSE TO THE SUBPOENA First of all, I appreciate your apology, though I must emphasize that your current course of action still raises concerns. While I understand that your interpretation of the Classification Act has put you on this course of action, I believe this unprecedented approach...
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honour, I must express my profound dismay at the egregious mishandling of this entire process. First of all your subpoena makes it look like you have summoned me in a private capacity, and not in the capacity of the Chief Justice, which...
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PETITION FOR REVIEW I hereby petition the Supreme Court to review the subject matter jurisdiction of the federal court to rule on this issue. To what extent is this a dispute between government institutions and to what extent does judicial...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Galavance used town money to pay themselves $85,000 2. Galavance was not allowed to pay himself because mayors are part of the federal government and...
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 69

    Senator, although you have a right to respond to the motion, I don't want to go into the contents of the first motion until the defence puts in the work to file the correct motion. Mr. Attorney General, I must express my deep frustration and disappointment at your apparent disregard for the...
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 69

    Your motion has been denied. The purpose of a complaint is to make clear what the plaintiff is complaining about, if you believe that it is unclear and you can not file an answer to the complaint you must file a motion to dismiss. Lack of evidence is not a valid reason for a motion to dismiss...
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 69

    Your motion has been denied. If you believe the complaint is incorrectly filed you must file a motion to dismiss. The deadline is not extended.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @Dartanman is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of...
  15. M

    Appeal: Accepted FCR 63 - Contempt Appeal

    The Supreme Court has decided to halt this appeal until the end of the case.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    The defence has 48 hours to post its closing statement.
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    Alright, we will now be moving on to closing statements. The prosecution has 48 hours to post their closing statement.
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Mask3D_WOLF v. The Commonwealth of Redmont FCR 64

    Yes, you may submit your response to the motion.
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Mask3D_WOLF v. The Commonwealth of Redmont FCR 64

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Attorney General is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Mask3D_WOLF v. The Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on...
Back
Top