Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Mask3D_WOLF v. The Commonwealth of Redmont FCR 64

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF MANDAMUS The Joint Legal Oversight Committee is hereby instructed to pause the questioning of Mask3D_WOLF without an attorney added to the panel until otherwise provided.
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Mask3D_WOLF v. The Commonwealth of Redmont FCR 64

    After careful consideration, I have decided to grant the Emergency Injunction at this time. It is essential to note that this decision does not imply the court's agreement with the presented argument. Rather, it is a measure taken to prevent irreversible and irreparable harm to the plaintiff if...
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    Does the defence wish to cross-examine the witnesses?
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    @Galavance is required to answer or reply to the follow-up questions within 48 hours, otherwise, they will be held in contempt (@Matthew100x )
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    Objection Denied. The question is asking Galavance for the purpose of the channel. If Galavance was personally involved in the creation of the channel he should be able to answer.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    Thank you shadownba, there may be follow-up questions so please stick around. Before moving on we are still waiting on @Galavance to answer the questions.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    Rights are not bargaining chips. As we don't have a formal discovery process. as long as the evidence is submitted before the closing statements, you can enter it into the record provided the prosecution doesn't have objections to the contents of the evidence.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS Shadownba and Galavance are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance FCR 59 as witnesses. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will...
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    Cross-examination questions will be asked after the prosecution, has finished its line of inquiry. Seeing as Galavance has already been summoned, I will only summon Shadownba on discord however both will be required to testify. I would also like to remind the accused of their right against...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    The evidence is allowed to enter the record, and the defence has 48 hours to submit its witnesses list as well as the relevant questions. The prosecution is hereby also requested to post their list of questions within 48 hours.
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    I hereby charge @cheeseeater77 with 1 count of contempt of court for talking when not a party to a case, and I order the DOJ to fine/jail them appropriately.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    The commonwealth has 48 hours to submit its witnesses list and any objections to the motion to submit new evidence.
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    The defence has 48 hours to submit its opening statement.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    Very well, all deadlines from now on are 48 hours, unless otherwise stated. Your deadline has been extended by 24 hours, meaning you must submit your opening statement by Tuesday 09:44 AM GMT.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    The prosecution has 24 hours to submit their opening statement.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    Filing a counter-claim means you are seeking civil relief therefore it's a civil affair and can not be handled by this court. You may assert defences without relief but this criminal court does not have the authority to handle civil cases. So if you are asking for relief from the government you...
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    In a criminal court, the introduction of a counterclaim is prohibited because claims are inherently civil. Furthermore, the defendant lacks the authority to represent the government and consequently cannot initiate charges within this courtroom. If there are any separate or related claims...
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. d3froggy [2023] FCR 60

    This case has been re-opened in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling on [2023] SCR 16.
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @Galavance is hereby required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known...
Back
Top