Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    This case has been re-opened in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling on [2023] SCR 15.
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] SCR 15

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT After careful deliberation, the Supreme Court has decided the following: 1. This is not an appeal or review from the Federal Court 2. It is not seeking to remove one of the following from office: ‌Representatives,‌ ‌Secretary,‌ ‌Senator,‌...
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. d3froggy [2023] SCR 16

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT After careful deliberation, the Supreme Court has decided the following: 1. This is not an appeal or review from the Federal Court 2. It is not seeking to remove one of the following from office: ‌Representatives,‌ ‌Secretary,‌ ‌Senator,‌...
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Galavance [2023] FCR 59

    This case is dismissed without prejudice, please re-file the case in the appropriate court using the correct format.
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. d3froggy [2023] FCR 60

    This case is dismissed without prejudice, please re-file the case in the appropriate court using the correct format.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed RoyBlue2 suing tech

    The wrong format, the wrong forum ( I moved it here), and generally just not a complaint. This seems more like a staff issue, however, if you want to get a lawyer. In #links there are some law firms or go to the RBA Discord Join the Redmont Bar Association Discord Server!. I will not charge you...
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Royblue2 suing WackJap

    Wrong format, the wrong forum ( I moved it here), and generally just not a complaint. I recommend getting a lawyer. In #links there are some law firms or go to the RBA Discord Join the Redmont Bar Association Discord Server!. I will not charge you with a frivolous court case or contempt of court...
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. CRB [2023] FCR 54

    I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The Plaintiff, Galavance, purchased a loan through the defendant, CRB, in an auction. 2. The loan was for $420,000, with $250,000 already paid off and $170,000 remaining. 3. The contract required monthly payments from the borrower, BlogWorldExpo. 4. BlogWorldExpo...
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bank of Reveille v. Stoppers [2023] FCR 58

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @Stoppers is hereby required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Bank of Reveille v. Stoppers Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bank of Reveille v. Stoppers [2023] FCR 58

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF MANDAMUS The Justice Department is hereby required to seize and hold the following assets from the defendant until further notice: 1. C693 2. C352 3. The remaining money in Stoppers balance up to a maximum of 15,000
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bank of Reveille v. Stoppers [2023] FCR 58

    The court is granting this emergency, until such a time an answer to a complaint or a motion to dismiss has been filed. Afterwards, the defendant may submit a motion to reconsider the emergency injunction.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. CRB [2023] FCR 54

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT After the conclusion of the sidebar and the recusal of the honourable Mask3D_Wolf, I will be the new presiding judge. The date of the in-game trial will remain the same. GMT Date: Saturday 1 July 2023 18:30:00 It has been noted that the...
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Supersuperking v. bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 55

    This case has been dismissed with prejudice because a settlement has been reached.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Supersuperking v. bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 55

    Does the defence have any objections?
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Supersuperking v. bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 55

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER RULLING After careful consideration of your motion to reconsider, I have taken into account your argument that the dismissal of a case is precedent when a party fails to respond within the allotted time frame. However...
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Supersuperking v. bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 55

    I hereby charge Dartanman with 1 count of contempt of court. The plaintiff has 24 hours to file their opening statement otherwise this case will be dismissed in favour of the defence. [ @supersuperking ] [ @Dartanman ]
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Supersuperking v. bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 55

    Alright, we are going to move on to the opening statements. The plaintiff has 24 hours to file their opening statement.
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Supersuperking v. bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 55

    Thank you for the answer. Before we move on would the parties be interested in an in-game trial to speed up the proces?
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Supersuperking v. bibsfi4a [2023] FCR 55

    Your motion to amend has been approved. The defence has 24 hours to respond with an answer to the complaint.
Back
Top