Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    Objection Breach of Procedure Having, xEndeavour testify without me being able to cross-examine him violates a fundamental right granted in almost all democracies. The reason I called the owner of the server was to ask if Westray had approached the owner's team about the best ballot as the...
  2. M

    Expungement: Granted VerySmolBirb Expungement Request [2022] FCR 45

    Your Honor, Given that these crimes have all taken place over two months ago, and that the requestor has maintained good behaviour for months now, the Office of the Attorney General, on behalf of the State, believes this expungement request meets all appropriate criteria.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    OBJECTION All of these questions are opinions and not facts. Witnesses should not testify to their own opinions. Especially not if these witnesses have a vested interest in this case. They are not reliable expert witnesses. This question is too vague, what is meant with "constitutes a rights...
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    I understand that contempt of court is a punishment but, this case has been filed not just in my personal interest but in the public's interest. It would be unreasonable to not hear all the facts of such an important case simply because I made a mistake with the time. So is it possible to still...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    I would like, to apologise, your honour, I misread the time for me it said 12:07 AM. I thought 12:07 AM would be 7min past midday so in 4 hours. Not 7 min past midnight 8 hours ago. I sincerely apologise for this error, where I'm from we don't use AM/PM but a 24-hour clock.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    Thank, you your honour. I understand but I would like to point out that specifically their opinions should be taken lightly. I would like to call the following witnesses: An owner of the server xEndeavour who can speak to whether it was or wasn't a complex change. An author of a similar bill...
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    Objection on Witnesses It is the purpose of the judiciary to be above politics, what relevance must the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate serve besides political one. Inviting these politicians brings no insight to this legal question and does nothing but lobby the judiciary to...
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    OPENING STATEMENT The Facts, of the case, are clear. The people have voted and the Best Ballot Act passed the house and the senate and has been given presidential assent as well. The Best Ballot act did not need a supermajority to pass on referendum because it wasn't a complex change. The...
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    Objection Point 1. If the defence is allowed to keep introducing new facts and arguments, we might as well just move on to opening statements. Or else we will continue with these objections indefinitely. Point 2. I included the whole definition but I can see the forums are glitched. I quoted...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    Objection Your, honour the defence does not appear to know what a motion to dismiss is for. I filed the case correctly, and there is no reason they shouldn't give a proper response to the case. The whole point of the case is to discuss and prove my facts, dismissing the case outright without...
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    Link to the proposed bill: https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/best-ballot-act.12712/ Link to Referendum: https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/best-ballot-act.12893/
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. The commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 42

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Milkcrack Plaintiff v. The commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF A bill has been put up to a referendum, and the people have...
  13. M

    Rescinded Appropriations Amendment Act - Not proposed yet

    A Bill To Amend the Constitution The people of Democracy Craft, through their elected representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short Title, Alternate Names and...
  14. M

    Bill: Rejected Best Ballot Act

    A BILL To Amend the Constitution The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives and Senators in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short...
  15. M

    Bill: Rejected Second Clarification of the Wild Act

    Nay - Not all laws that are illegal in towns and cities are applicable in the wild.
  16. M

    Bill: Rejected Urgency in proposal act

    *Senator LilNickiVert Did not co-sponsor this legislation. However, due to the fact that this was an accident and it has already passed the house, meaning that there was enough support for the bill. I will allow this bill to stay on the Senate floor per section 22 - Peer review of The...
  17. M

    Repealed The Hugebob Amendment

    House Vote: 6-3-0 Senate Vote: 4-0-0 A BILL TO Remove the Hugebob Amendment The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives and Senators in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the...
  18. M

    Information Legislative Standards Act

    House Vote: 8-1-0 Senate Vote: 4-0-0 A BILL To Amend the Legislative Standards Act The people of Democracy Craft, through their elected representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following...
  19. M

    Bill: Rejected Reveille Approval Resolution

    I will be voting no on this resolution because I think it's not productive in its goal. The resolution is too vague and does not allow for partial or contingent agreement and maybe be interpreted as unconditional support.
Back
Top