Search results

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF CERTIORARI The Supreme Court of Redmont has voted unanimously to accept this appeal, grant a writ of certiorari, and hear this case within the Supreme Court. Please refile your case in the Supreme Court subnode within the next 48 hours.

xEndeavour, you are out of order. This case has been dismissed and the thread was locked prior to your motion. The Supreme Court holds you in direct contempt of court. Since this is xEndeavour 3+ offense according to records held by the Department of Justice, the maximum penalty will be levied...

The Supreme Court of Redmont has decided to not hear this case due to the claims for relief being insufficient to grant any relief. In the plaintiff’s first claim for relief, it is claimed that the Supreme Court put the plaintiff on trial without his own representation in [2022] SCR 20. The...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT The petitioner of the appeal has been deported. Deported citizens cannot participate in Redmont activities including the ability to appeal cases. For this reason, the Supreme Court will reject this appeal.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Matthew100x v. xEndeavour [2022] SCR 21 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. One count of treason for failing to post a referendum on the Department Reform Act. 2. One count of treason for failing to follow Supreme Court decorum and calling the...

752

Motion rejected. If you wish to edit a statement, you may ask the Court to amend it. However, you may not just post clarification over your points when not asked or prompted. You are former Chief Justice and arguing before the Supreme Court, you've had plenty of time to learn Court procedure.

You are out of order. I find xEndeavour in direct contempt of this court. You were warned in the above that if you wish to speak make it in the form of a motion, objection, or request to the Court. Since this is xEndeavour 3+ offense according to records held by the Department of Justice, the...

Denied - The defendant has not made any new remarks questioning the legality of this case that have not already been answered by the Court.

Both of you are out of order. If you wish to speak, please make it in the form of an objection, motion, or request to the Court.

Chief Justice Krix has already provided a decision and reasoning for the perjury charge. A presiding Judge/Justice is not required to write a full opinion for an objection.

Apologies for the late response. You may ask the Court to review unanswered motions/objections. Unless there are further objections or motions, the Supreme Court will break to conference for review of this case.

I will be striking the comments made by Kitje_Katje_NL. Furthermore, after a brief discussion with the Staff team, Kitje_Katje_NL will be prohibited from responding to this case as banned players "can't do any citizen activity." The Federal Court notes the absence of the other party. Pursuant...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Commonwealth of Redmont v. Kitje_Katje_NL et al. [2023] FCR 1. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment. I'd...

Kitje_Katje_NL, do not speak in this case unless you have been summoned. This is your final warning. Do not speak out of turn again.

Thank you for your response Mr. Jakovus. This case will continue as a reverse class action.

Request denied. Motions have already been ruled upon.

This statement will be struck from the record as it was an improper response to an improper objection.

Objection overruled. Improper objection. Please follow the listed objections in the objection guide.

Motion to Dismiss rejected. The Court has already addressed similar motions to dismiss made on similar points of law. This Court will not change its decision-making just because the Chief Justice has been recused.