Motion to reconsider rejected. The Court has already made its decision as has held that decision. Just because the Chief Justice has been recused does not mean the Court will change its prior decisions.
After careful consideration, I have decided to accept parts of the motion to recuse. The only part of the motion to recuse I am accepting is bias/appearance of bias, specifically, point 2.
Under the right of political communication afforded to all citizens of Redmont, the defendant is allowed...
Good Afternoon Mr. Jakovus,
Before I issue a summons to the defendants, I wish to know the reason for filing this criminal case as a reverse class action. Frankly, I don't see enough evidence to support the claim that Kitje_Katje_NL and Olisaurus123 worked together. In order to provide a fair...
Both Judge dygyee and Judge BananaNova have recused themselves from this case citing potential conflict of interest. The Constitution of Redmont grants individual justices the ability to exercise the responsibilities of lower courts (Part 2 Section 19). I will be presiding over the duration of...
The Supreme Court has voted to not hear this case in the first instance. This case deals with the possibility of a vice president serving as a secretary within certain departments, however, does not call for the actual removal of any secretary.
Under Section 19 of the Redmont Constitution...
After careful consideration, I have decided to reject the motion. When considering a motion to recuse, the burden of proof on the party filing the motion, not the Justice. When looking at the arguments laid before the Court within the motion, I cannot accept this motion. The alleged bias remains...
Since the District Court of Redmont has original jurisdiction over this case, it will be heard in the District Court in the first instance.
Ohgizmo, this is your final warning for filing cases in the wrong subforum. In the future, file cases in the appropriate subnode.
IN THE DISTRICT/FEDERAL/SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Commonwealth of Redmont v. Milqy [2022] SCR 16
I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION
1. One count of corruption by the defendants proposed loan of $300,000 within the Commonwealth Reserve Bank.
2. One count of corruption for Milqy...
Apologies, I was on fall break and forgot to ask for a closing statement from the defendant. The defendant has 48 hours to provide their closing statement (October 18 at 11:08 PM EST).
Seeing has time limit has expired, I will be dismissing all the witnesses and the court will move on to closing arguments. The Commonwealth has 48 hours to provide its closing statement (October 13 at 8:11 PM EST).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
LilDigiVert, huney69, Intercepticon, Deadwax, and xEndeavour is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Milqy. as witnesses. All witnesses have 48 hours to mark there that they are...
The objection on perjury is overruled; the defendant has not perjured himself.
Both objections on relevance is overruled; improper use of the relevance objection.
The objection on assumes facts not in evidence is overruled; improper use of the objection.
This Court is now in recess while the...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Declaration of Mistrial in Case [2022] FCR 65
Seeing as plaintiff's original lawyer failed to perform the duty of an attorney, the plaintiff was given unfair council that may have cost the plaintiff their case. The Supreme Court hereby...
Overruled. The Commonwealth was late by 120 seconds. There is a huge difference between being late by 120 seconds and 120 minuets.
The Court now ask for the defendant to provide its closing statement within the next 48 hours (October 5th at 5:05 PM EST).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.