IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS
The plaintiff will argue each point brought by the Commonwealth:
1. The commonwealth request that this case be dismissed on multiple reasons, firstly the case law that has been quoted by the defendant as...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE
The Plaintiff wishes to strike the entire motion to dismiss, as it does not state in anyway whatsoever why the case should be dismissed and is only giving arguments in the case, which should be placed in an answer to...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY INJUCTION
The Plaintiff ask that c610 is removed from Bombaz2005 until this case ends, to prevent it from being sold off to someone else or to have changes to the build that will be hard to repair or irreparable.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
zLost
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
An auction for c610 was created, and as I was interested in the plot, I bid on it and engaged in a...
OBJECTION
Ambiguous
The questions asked by the Plaintiff are not clear and precise enough, as they haven't specified which accusal. According the Plaintiff earlier, Dumbyhead claimed that Bardiya "forged" the documents and also claimed that Bardiya got them fired. There are two accusals, and...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
Your Honor, the contract provided in Exhibit A is invalid, as the Contract Law Creation Act states:
(2) The only restrictions upon such contracts is that any contract which would compel any party to violate the law is void, no...
Follow-up Questions
For Bombaz2005:
1. Can you send, or describe the evidence (if you don't have the evidence anymore) sent to you by Bardiya_King?
2. Were you sent the Document linked in the opening statement when you requested the valuation of the company, or was something else sent?
3. To...
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
The reason for the objection was "Assume facts not in evidence". The Defence proved that this was something already stated in evidence, as such the Defence asks to reconsider sustaining the objection.
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION
It is to know if there was any possible bias between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, during the investigation.
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION
The case was built upon two main statements, being that Dumby saying that Bardiya "forged" the document, and Dumby claiming that Bardiya...
Your Honor, I apologize for this but I request a 24 hour extension, as I have a mid-term exam tomorrow and was unable to finish my opening statement in time due to it.
Questions for Bombaz2005
1. How did Uffizi Holdings come to the conclusion that Dumby was the one that forged the documents?
2. Was Bardiya_King the one who assessed the value of the company?
3. What is your relation with Bardiya_King on the server?
4. Did Dumby give an offer of $350k, or did...
The Defence would like to call Bardiya_King and Bombaz2005
Bardiya_King: Is involved in the case heavily, as they were the one that made the document with the value of Megacorp.
Bombaz2005: Owner of Uffizi Holdings, company that bought Megacorp.
OBJECTION
Perjury
Your Honor, the Plaintiff's evidence only shows one person who has questioned them. Along with this, that one person was neither a peer nor a customer.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.