Search results

  1. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Breach of Procedure and Motion to Strike Counsel was not prompted to respond and motions are not able to be automatically responded to.
  2. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Breach of Procedure and Motion to Strike
  3. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] FCR 12

    Argumentative and Breach of Procedure I answered the question, just above the motion to dismiss. It may not be to End’s liking, but I told the truth.
  4. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] FCR 12

    Breach of Procedure This is not formatted as a motion or objection per court procedures.
  5. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] FCR 12

    Argumentative I answered the question exactly as the plaintiff asked it. He has no more questions remaining and he is attempting to use out of turn statements to harass me.
  6. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    MOTION TO RECONSIDER Respectfully, your honor, this is the very definition of speculation. Vernicia cannot testify toward what other people believed about the situation.
  7. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Speculation, Calls for Conclusion
  8. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] FCR 12

    I indeed formed an opinion and publicly stated it regardless of that presumption; I wasn't in Court and it isn't my job to consider "innocent until proven guilty" as a mere civilian in that capacity. Motion to Dismiss Your honor, the plaintiff has just admitted that the comments in question...
  9. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] FCR 12

    Breach of Procedure and Motion to Strike
  10. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] FCR 12

    DOJ members don't get access to your criminal record like DHS employees do so I have no idea what specific offenses you have or have not been charged with or found guilty of in the past.
  11. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 8

    Let us re-examine the facts and discuss the evidence available. The defense affirms facts 1 and 9, so evidence is not needed to prove them; they are stipulated. 2, 3, 6, and 7 are irrelevant to our claims and are no reason to dismiss this case with or without proof, they merely establish...
  12. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    His testimony was given when he was not deported. Edit: whoops
  13. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCR 3 [2025] Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    I apologize your honor, I was traveling and missed this in all the amicus brief confusion. I will get this in the next four hours if I could ask the court for a tiny bit more patience
  14. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    what about my legal fees. Also why does it say rule in favor of the defense when I basically won.
  15. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCR 3 [2025] Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    Your honor, I would have to oppose this as he is biased due to being a candidate in the election against my client.
  16. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: In Session Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10

    It says one motion per decision. I am motioning to reconsider the decision resulting from the other motion to reconsider. Furthermore, the Constitution grants the right to appeal offenses, and this MTR is the best way to do so at the start with the least burden on court resources.
  17. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 8

    You want to play that way? So can I. Consider this my valid response to your objection.
  18. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 8

    Breach of Procedure The defense is not permitted to just make an errant comment, especially when it is not a motion or other valid and allowed court procedure.
  19. Alexander P. Love

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 8

    The plaintiff will respond in the next 12 hours.
Back
Top