Search results

Nope. Xtub explained the reasoning why they were able to and I affirm the reasoning and going beyond that you again do not choose who rules on the Motion to Recuse as anyone else on the Judiciary can rule on it. I'm not entertaining this.

No, your fishing expedition and further ends here. You don't get to pick who rules on your Motion to Recuse nor do you decide who presides over your case. You are using this as a way to choose who rules on your case and likely who will auto rule in your favor. You know how the Court System works...

That does not explain as to why it cannot be public. No Closed Court Session is needed and you will provide the ticket within 24 hours.

You know how Court Procedures work. This is struck due to not stating whether this is an Objection or a Motion.

This is struck for lack of clarity on whether this is a Motion or Objection.

This does not mean the requirements for recusal as per the Judicial Standards Act as listed below.

This will be overruled as regardless of when the mistake is realized the deed can still be corrected. We are correcting the mistake that has been going on and while I do appreciate you bringing the cases to my attention, the rules should still be enforced and as Nacholebraa has stated in the...

Can you explain why exactly this the ticket would be classified? As in what in it is unable to be shown in a public setting.

Thank you, due to neither side filing witnesses we will be moving straight into Closing Statements. The Prosecution has 72 hours to provide their Closing Statement.

This is overruled as stated within your very own Motion to Reconsider, you cannot Motion to Reconsider a second time.

This is struck due to failure to clarify if they are Motioning of Objecting.

This is overruled as the same can be applied to any job. If I'm a cashier, that does not show I am qualified for Regional Manager however I can still be hired in that position. It is not the duty of the Courts to manage who the Departments can and cannot promote. If the Secretary saw that...

Ah I thought one was already provided, scratch that then you have 48 hours to provide an answer to complaint.

You have an additional 2 hours.

You have an additional 24 hours. I will be partially granting this Objection of perjury. The reason for partial is the final paragraph pertaining to dismissal is the only part not being accepted. The reasoning for this is that when you are promoted you still do not keep the position you are...

You have an additional 24.

The Plaintiff has 24 hours to respond to the Objection.

The Defense has 24 hours to respond.

I will be granting this Motion to Compel and the Plaintiff is to file this within 48 hours.

I will be granting the Motion to Reconsider. The statement from the Plaintiff regarding "Based on multiple cases, Multiple judges and Multiple levels of the court no one enforces rule 4.6 so to strike this evidenced based on rule 4.6 would be going against almost the entire Judiciary" while yes...