Search results

- Client Name: lawanoesepr - Counsel Name: lawanoesepr - Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Defendant - Reason for the Appeal: The court did not take into account that this was opinion and not a fact. They also did not take into account that I did not knowingly make a false...

Aladeen21 Plaintiff v. Lawanoesepr Defendant I CLOSING STATEMENT 1. I, in my opinion believe the defendant is corrupt. A opinion is not a fact. 2. If the defendant is not corrupt I still would not be guilty of slander, as I did not knowingly make a false statement. 3. I had presented...

Proof of representation

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Mercuryellow Plaintiff v. Pandaz8 Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The defendant refuses to pay the plaintiff for his services WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF...

Your honor, the defendant has no witnesses

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Aladeen21 Plaintiff v. Lawanoesepr Defendant I OPENING STATEMENT 1. I did not at time knowingly make a false statement because in my sole opinion he acted in a corrupt way. I still believe that he acted in a corrupt way...

I would like to edit my motion I just realized that the plaintiff did not vote in favor of the removal. He abstained.

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Aladeen Plaintiff v. Lawanoesepr Defendant MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: I did have evidence like the fact that the defendant...

The defendant declines

Yes I did. I do believe the RBA was in it's right to pass this motion but I also believe that the attorney general was within his right to block it as being the organizer of the RBA Not in my opinion a sole requirement as many other factors in our by laws and in other acts as like The attorney...

Your honor, I am present before this court

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Timedefender Plaintiff v. DCT Defendant MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The plaintiff alleges that his "freedom of speech"...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Lawanoesepr Plaintiff v. AlexanderLove Defendant Your honor, The defendant had terminated my employment before proceeding to inform my employer at apex law firm about my termination without my consent. The defendant...

Question for sumoMC: 1. Is it true that I was giving information on the individual not the company 2. Wasn't the defendant disbarred at the time of the lawsuit

- Client Name: lawanoesepr - Counsel Name: lawanoesepr - Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff - Reason for the Appeal: The bill did not get a referendum after being called a constitutional amendment. - Additional Information:

Your, Honor A conversation between alexanderLove and the at the time managing partnerJoeGamer happened. I am asking joeGamer if an attempt was made to get me fired at the time.

1. Did the defendant inform you of me being terminated from the Lovely Law Firm? 2. Was there an attempt to get my employment with Apex terminated? 3. Do you believe that the defendant breached the Employee Protection Act?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Lawanoesepr Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS 1. It does require to undergo referendum due to it being a constitutional amendment. 2. The bill does fit under the...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT nnmc Plaintiff v. Department of Justice Defendant Your honor, The plaintiffs claimed they need compensation for this case, however they never showed why they need so much money due to a single death. Also the plaintiffs...

I did not leak any company information as the defendant was suing on behalf of himself, Not the lovely law firm. Therefore no corporate espionage was committed as the defendant is not a company, He may own that company but he did not sue on behalf of the company. I had merely told lies to the...