I must warn you not to speak out of turn again.
I understand your concerns, and the Federal Court issued summons in-game and here on forums. This Court is acquainted with the Defendant's circumstances, and did everything to make sure they receive the summons in time. Unfortunately, I cannot...
After careful examination of the proceedings, there are significant problems I ran into when trying to come to a verdict. One must derive the verdict from points of law, set out in a fair and speedy trial - something I found increasingly difficult examining the flow of this case.
As set out in...
For speaking out of turn, acting unprofessionally, and insulting the previous judicial officer, I charge you with one count of contempt of court.
Now, I will use this occasion to apologise in the name of the Federal Court, your trial was extended way past any reasonable limits. I am now...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Jeygame7816 v. Destined7433 [2024] FCR 125
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. On 14th October, 2024, the Defendant became burdened by attorney-client privilege immediately after confirming that they are open for any legal work assinged by...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Aveke [2024] FCR 126
I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION
1. The Commonwealth of Redmont alleges that the Defendant, Aveke, facilitated and executed the trafficking of illegal substances, and in support thereof...
Now that witness testimony concluded, I call on the Plaintiff to deliver their Closing Statement within next 72h. After they submit it, the Defendant shall also have 72h.
Please respect imposed deadlines.
Sustained
The deadline was breached by four minutes. The Defendant could have notified this court if an extension was necessary; no such notification was given. Entirety of the follow-ups are struck.
Overruled
I would request that next time the Defendant's counsel use appropriate template.
We are moving to opening statements. Prosecution is called to deliver an opening argument, they have 72h to do so. When they submit it, the Defendant also has 72h.
Overruled
This question does not help in disproving loss of enjoyment; it concerns the previous counsel, not the current one. Previous counsel may have caused such loss for acting in a certain manner; current one does not have anything to do with it.
Sustained
Question 3 does not appear to hold any significance in ascertaining the circumstances of this case nor help in (dis)proving liability. Struck.
Overruled
I am not sure what you are trying to point out, but none of those questions are leading.
The Defendant is now allowed to question the witnesses. You have 24h to do so; witnesses have 24h to answer from the moment the questions are posted.
If you wish not to question, notify the Court so we can move forward.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.