Search results

Done.

Sustained. Third question for Jeygame is hereby stricken from the record, as well as the witness' answer to it.

Sustained. I apologise, the request of the prosecution to take the evidence down was missed by me. I hereby strike P-002.

Overruled. This question assumes nothing; it asks if the investigation impacted the player's ability to enjoy the server. If I asked you that question, did I assume it impacted you? No, I am trying to ascertain whether that's the case. I will point out that the third question is problematic...

Overruled. In Article 3, Section 1, it is stated that such evidence can be used to satisfy the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt. First video shows the Defendant handling illegal substances; their admission of guilt may serve to prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt in this...

Sustained As the conditions are peculiar here, the Court will extend the Discovery to 72h since its opening. Now, it is important to note that: 1) It is a long standing convention to see if there is interest between both parties to extend the Discovery, and if they fail to reach a concensus...

The Discovery deadlines remain in effect, seeing as both parties do not concur on whether to extend it.

Does the Prosecution concur?

Now that the Public Defence Programme is active again, Public Defender is assigned to the Defendant. Discovery is now open and will last 48 hours. If an extension is needed, notify the Court in reasonable advance.

Overruled. The definiton of the "non-responsive" objection is "When a witness's answer does not address the question asked or fails to provide any response"; the witness refused to produce an answer altogether, instead pleading the fifth. It is a broad protection against self-incrimination, and...

@dodrio3 start questioning the witnesses. Present them with their respective questions in the next 24 hours. Witnesses are called to respond within 24 hours of the questions; strictly respond to what is asked of you, and do not speak unless addressed. Follow-up questions may be presented within...

The Court is currently reviewing options for appointment of a Public Defender, I request of the Prosecution to be patient. For now, Court stands in recess.

@Jeygame7816 and @razorsharpbread are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Jeygame7816 v. Destined7433 [2024] FCR 125. To clarify: This is a witness summons. As there are no templates for witness summons yet, the regular one is used. You are called to express presence...

Overruled Before jumping to such conclusions I would request from the Plaintiff's counsel to read my instructions more thoroughly. Please keep in mind that objections are not a vehicle for insults, nor is it your duty to advise the opposite party on their counsel. Now that that's cleared up, I...

Ten days have elapsed since I filed the case; I respectfully request the Court to move forward with the matter.

@Aveke is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth v. Aveke [2024] FCR 126.

I call on the Plaintiff to deliver their Opening Statement in the next 72 hours. Immediately after the Plaintiff, the Defendant will have 72 hours to post their Opening. Notify the Court in reasonable advance if an extension is needed.

I call on the Defendant to deliver Answer to Complaint within 72 hours. Failure to do so will result in a default judgement.

Seeing as parties are dissonant on whether to conduct an in-game trial, this case will proceed on the fora.

Discovery will last 72 hours from now. Submit interrogatories, evidence, and witness lists in this timeframe. If extension is needed, notify the court in due time. I remind the parties of the possibility of an in-game trial, should both parties be amenable to it, and I encourage you to...