Search results

  1. pugbandit

    Ok guys i heard some people are thinking of not voting joan LMAO?! Be smart its joans time!

    Ok guys i heard some people are thinking of not voting joan LMAO?! Be smart its joans time!
  2. pugbandit

    Bill: Rejected Pardon Removal Act

    A BILL To Amend the Constitution and prevent tyranny within the nation The people of Democracy Craft, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into...
  3. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Church of Pablo v. RelaxedGV and Associating Parties [2021] FCR 93

    Thank you. The Defence may proceed with their closing statement within 72 hours, please.
  4. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Dismissed byeSprite v. The Executive Branch of Redmont [2021] FCR 91

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Defendant, the Attorney General, is required to appear before the court in the case of byeSprite v. The Executive Branch of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in...
  5. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Church of Pablo v. RelaxedGV and Associating Parties [2021] FCR 93

    24 hours have passed. I would like to thank the witness, firstly. The Plaintiff may now proceed with their closing statement and that it is presented within 72 hours.
  6. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Church of Pablo v. RelaxedGV and Associating Parties [2021] FCR 93

    I will give the Defence 24 more hours if they wish the cross examine the witness.
  7. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Spectre Industries v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2021] FCR 87

    The case is dismissed as a settlement has been made and implemented out of the court. Thank you to all parties involved.
  8. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Spectre Industries v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2021] FCR 87

    The court is in recess. Please keep the court updated.
  9. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Church of Pablo v. RelaxedGV and Associating Parties [2021] FCR 93

    The Defence may also cross examine the witness now and can present their questions if they have any.
  10. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Church of Pablo v. RelaxedGV and Associating Parties [2021] FCR 93

    I am granting this and thus am issuing a court order to receive these logs too.
  11. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Spectre Industries v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2021] FCR 87

    May the defendant please confirm this
  12. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned AlexanderLove v. The Redmont Bar Association [2021] FCR 86

    1) At the time no, I believe that there is one now, however. By standards, I believe that the elected RBA council members (at the time I presided over) were entitled to a basic view of where standards should be. 2) From the time there were none. 3) I do not recollect any warnings- and have no...
  13. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Spectre Industries v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2021] FCR 87

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The defendant, the Commonwealth of Redmont. is required to appear before the court in the case of the Spectre Industries (The Lovely Law Firm representing) v. Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this...
  14. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Church of Pablo v. RelaxedGV and Associating Parties [2021] FCR 93

    Before I make a ruling on this, would you like to ask the witness questions before or after I make a decision on whether to issue a court order?
  15. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Church of Pablo v. RelaxedGV and Associating Parties [2021] FCR 93

    Staff have provided the court with the following logs:
  16. pugbandit

    Lawsuit: Adjourned AlexanderLove v. The Redmont Bar Association [2021] FCR 86

    1) A "plot"- definitely not. There was a procedure and debate at the end of which we decided that the license should be removed due to a breach of our ethical standards. 2) No there was no reason for us to feel "threatened". 3) I can speak for myself in saying- no I was not pressured into voting...
Back
Top