Thank you, I appreciate your understanding Mr. Representative.
I am not sure in regards to your question. You would have to reach out to the Speaker's office. I have noticed a few bills with the colour coding issue. If it is not an amendment, it doesn't need to be green.
This bill is hereby vetoed.
While I recognize with the nature of the bill, there are a few key issues with it in its current form.
First of all, the bill is not an amendment to an existing law or the constitution, therefore it is not properly formatted. The green colour coding only applies if...
This bill is hereby vetoed.
While I recognize with the nature of the bill, there are a few key issues with it in its current form.
The law of §13.4 Attempted Murder listed here clearly indicates that it is the act of hitting another player and causing more than 3 hearts of damage. The charge...
After such respective discussions in the Department of State ticket, I consulted briefly with the Attorney General about the matter. As expressed in the Commonwealth's defence, the members of our legal team have provided reasoning behind the denial of the request and how such records remain...
You asked me to provide a definition of what I believed a government document is, and I answered your question. Considering the context of the Classification Act and Executive Standards Act, a government document is one that is retained solely by the government in national interest. It is...
This bill is hereby vetoed.
While I agree with the nature of the bill, there are a few key issues with it in its current form.
"2.) Representatives should avoid the usage of excessive profanity or insults (except towards Canadians)."
This clause, while clearly a joke, could be used to...
Within the context of the laws referenced in this case, to my understanding, a government document is one that is retained solely by the government in national interest.
I believe I answered your question. Yes, your request was denied as it was not in line with departmental policy or the law. The Executive Standards Act outlined the process for the sharing of criminal records, which only allows individuals to access their own records. When I responded to your...
We informed you in that ticket that we could not accept your request, given that the Executive Standards Act outlines the process for the sharing of criminal records, which only allows individuals to access their own records. It was an unreasonable request that we could not fulfill with respect...
I responded to the ticket accordingly in order to clarify and explain to you the laws and policies regarding the matter at hand. It was an act of good faith in trying to help you solve your issues within the bounds of policy and law. Additionally I have remained as an employee of the department...
You asked me yes or no if I answered at 6:49 pm MDT, to which I clarified that it was the 39th minute, not the 49th minute, and at 8:39pm EST in my time. Yes, I did respond to you as evident in the transcript.
It was on the 39th minute of the hour, in EST at 8:39 PM. My response to such ticket is already in what has been noted in Plaintiff Exhibit C from the transcript accordingly.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.