IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Crusaders At Law v. the Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment.
I will be presiding...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Case No. 11-2021-05-02
I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION
1. The Prosecution alleges that the Defendant used their position as auditor to unlawfully share private information in the town of Oakridge's discord.
2. The Prosecution claims that...
Given the allocated time of 48 hours and the additional 24 hours has surpassed, the Supreme Court will be convening tomorrow to deliver a verdict of default judgement. After multiple warnings and notices from the court we have not gotten a response from the Defendant and will be moving forward...
I would like to ask that the Defendant responds as soon as possible given that it would be rather unfortunate for a case of such measure, being one of the Supreme Court, to be granted default judgement.
I will be setting a deadline of 24 hours for the Defendant, given that it has already been...
You have not been summoned to this case nor have you been named as a party or counsel to this case. Given your stature as a former Representative, you should be aware of the laws at the least, if not court procedures. Therefore, I find you in contempt. Please do not speak in a court case whereby...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ReinausPrinzipp. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment.
I'd also like to...
Thank you for your appeal however the Supreme Court has decided to reject this appeal for the time being.
This is because the Redmont Bar Association has recently disbarred the individual filing this case. Should they wish to file another lawsuit, they will need new counsel and or to...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Case No. 10-2021-02
I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff, AlexanderLove, alleges that the Defendant unlawfully used his position as Attorney General to block a motion to forbid the Solicitor General from being RBA Chairman/Council...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Case No. 09-2021-15-02
I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff, 1950minecrafter, represented by Pugbandit and the Lovely Law Firm, allege that Austin27 and 218218Consumer engaged in corruption and electoral fraud as the presiding...
Considering he is a key party to this case, I would agree with that notion. He will not be provided any sort of presiding oversight to this case. As for the recent vacancy of the Justice who was also presiding over this case, I will ask that both parties express patience with the courts.
Considering the facts, the Supreme Court has convened and would like to clarify that we believe the Standing Orders are considered valid. As mentioned in our rejection of the motion to dismiss, we believe that the standing orders are quasi law, or at least a contract that bounds Representatives...
After deliberations, the Supreme Court has unanimously decided to dismiss this case without prejudice.
The claims and contents of this case clearly involve the Plaintiff against RockCod_01, 218218Consumer, and GoldBlooded. Instead, the Plaintiff has filed this case solely against RockCod_01...
The Court would like to ask that the Defendant provides more clarity on what we are being asked to estop. The Defendant needs to precisely examine what exactly they are seeking from the court. Thank you.
The Supreme Court has decided to grant an alternative decision to the request to issue an injunction filed by the Plaintiff against preventing the President from pardoning any individual during this case. Given that there has been no claim that the President nor President-Elect has been...
The Supreme Court has convened and decided to unanimously reject the motion to dismiss at this time. The argument presented is fundamentally flawed and not grounded within the principles of the Constitution.
As directly examined in the Constitution, the Supreme Court of Redmont is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.