Search results

Did the Defendant wish to cross-examine any of the witnesses?

Were there any additional questions that the Plaintiff wished to present to any of the witnesses before providing the Defendant the opportunity for cross-examination?

Does the Plaintiff have additional questions and or questions to pose to the other witnesses? As expressed prior it is pertinent that this case proceeds without delay. Thank you.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @RelaxedGV, @ElainaThomas29, and @ReinausPrinzzip are hereby summoned to the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 09-2021-15-02 as witnesses. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Appealed: Case No. 07-2021-06 I. ORIGINAL CASE DECISION 1. On July 17 2021, the Federal Court of Redmont dismissed the case per the verdict issued by the Hon. MilkCrack. 2. This appeal was accepted July 23 2021, and therefore the...

Thank you for presenting the necessary exhibits. My apologies for any delay as the court has been considering these testimonies and the objections presented in regards to them. Since the Plaintiff wishes to move given the urgency of this case, the court will note the objections and move forward...

The Supreme Court has convened and decided to collectively overrule the objection to the testimony of Austin27. We believe that the answers provided have been adequate given the questions provided. If more questions are necessary to properly examine their points, the Plaintiff may present...

@Austin27 and @218218Consumer you both hereby have 48 hours to respond to the questions by the Plaintiff or you may face contempt charges. Please be aware of your rights and obligations. Thank you.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO @Austin27 and @218218Consumer are hereby summoned to the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 09-2021-15-02 in order to establish the extent of their authority to act as the Presiding Officer in the...

The Supreme Court will be granting the Plaintiff's request for a Writ of Quo Warranto to be issued to 218218Consumer and _Austin27_. We see it pertinent to inquire what authorities they may claim to pertain, in addition I do believe that the objection presented does not have proper grounds...

The court will ask that the Defendant provides their closing statement within 48 hours, or the court will proceed to a verdict without it.

Thank you for the points raised from both parties. The Supreme Court will collectively convene over the next few days to review this and determine what witnesses to summon, in addition to whether or not to issue a Writ of Quo Warranto in relation to the respective authorities. In the meantime...

The Court would like to thank both parties for the arguments they have presented here thus far. We will now begin the testimony proceedings in accordance with the Court Rules and Procedures. Each party has 72 hours to indicate whether they have any additional evidence and or witness testimony...

Alright, thank you. The Defendant may now present their closing statement.

The Supreme Court has recently convened and came to a decision on this request. The court will be rejecting such request at this time. The swearing-in of Representatives is a long held tradition within the House of Representatives, and an event codified within the Legislative Standards Act. The...

Thank you. The Plaintiff is now asked to present their opening statement. In addition to this, the court would also like to ask that a timestamp of Evidence 2 where 218218Consumer states "Congratulations to the Deputy Speaker of the 9th House of Representatives" is provided. Just a screenshot...

Thank you for bringing this to the attention of the court. The emergency injunction still remains extant and in effect. Pursuant of this owner action to mark certain evidence inadmissible, the court will consider that the deleted messages in #speaker-election were a result of informal comment...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the 1950minecrafter v. The Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment. I'd also like to...

In accordance with the precedent established in Case No. 05-2021-11, in order for the day-to-day operations of the government to function, the Court will not be granting the full injunction. In such respective case, the legitimacy of former President Hugebob was challenged, and during the case...

Alright, thank you. We will proceed to closing statements. First, I will ask that the Plaintiff presents their closing statement, followed by the Defendant.