Search results

I have a few questions to the Plaintiff's counsels to clarify the relationship of this case to the witness, Dwerpy. Are the Plaintiffs alleging that the witness, Dwerpy, misled a police officer into falsely arresting them? And if so, would they believe that Dwerpy could potentially hold guilt...

Please express patience with the Supreme Court while we evaluate the validity of the testimony presented and the allegations of perjury. Thank you.

Alright, thank you. Provided either party has nothing more to present or pose to the respective witnesses, I will ask that the Plaintiff presents their closing statement.

In the interest of hearing the complete facts, the Defendant can share such evidence prior to closing statements, provided it allows the opportunity for the Plaintiff to provide response to it. I have to say I am not impressed with the surprise introduction of evidence presented by the...

Provided there are no further questions, we will move to the next witness. I would like the Plaintiff to present the questions they would like their witness, Sergecool, to answer. After that, the Defendant will have an opportunity to cross-examine.

@Dwerpy it is required that you answer the questions from the Plaintiff at your earliest convenience. Failure to respond will result in contempt of court charges. Thank you.

Does the Defendant have any additional questions to pose to the witness?

Did the Plaintiff or Defendant have any additional questions for the witness before we proceed?

You will be given the opportunity to cross examine first, given that the Justice Secretary has already provided their remarks for the Defendant's case in the written testimony.

@Dwerpy it is required that you answer the questions from the Plaintiff at your earliest convenience. Failure to respond will result in contempt of court charges. Thank you.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @ElainaThomas29 is hereby summoned to the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 07-2021-06-01 as a witness. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from...

I believe that the argument of the Plaintiff has the most merit in this instance, given that this written testimony by the Justice Secretary was presented without providing the opposing counsel the opportunity to cross-examine and question the remarks made in such statement. Fortunately, I have...

Given the Federal Court has an adequate amount of Judges, the Supreme Court has determined that this case should be moved to the Federal Court. The Supreme Court acts as primarily a place of appeal, and the Federal Court may hear constitutional matters in the first instance, as noted within the...

Given the Federal Court has an adequate amount of Judges, the Supreme Court has determined that this case should be moved to the Federal Court. The Supreme Court acts as primarily a place of appeal, and the Federal Court may hear constitutional matters in the first instance, as noted within the...

Does the Plaintiff wish to cross-examine the witness?

That concludes witness testimony. Was there any additional evidence that either party wished to present before we proceed to closing statements?

Provided the Defendant has no objection this witness is hereby dismissed. As for the other witnesses, they will both proceed to answer the questions in this case. Firstly, I would like the Defendant to present the questions they would like their witness, Dwerpy, to answer. After that, the...

The Defendant may now cross-examine the witness if they wish to do so.

Does the Plaintiff have any further questions for the witness before we proceed to cross-examination?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @MoyUwU is hereby summoned to the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 07-2021-06-01 as a witness. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from the...