Search results

proof is not always needed

never mind I understand why this case cant be ongoing is because is to long since it happened

CIVIL ACTION FTGWop Plaintiff v. .Poormrbeast Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Defendant called me a corrupt politican I. PARTIES 1. FTGWop 2. .Poormrbeast II. FACTS 1. On 4th april 2023 .Poormrbeast said in global chat that I was a corrupt...

I Order this case to be ongoing

dude this is not a frivoulous case also when somebody made a case against me they didnt get called frivoulous this case is going to be ongoing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION FTGWop Plaintiff v. Ohgizmo Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Defendant a few months ago decided to sue me with a false pretext that I would have slandered them it both hurt my...

I am present I didnt know I where a witness in this case

This is a very weak case first of all it exist no evidence of me actually doing this crime. also Vernicia is not a reliable witness in this case since it seems like Vernicia has something against me for no reason since I am banned from her store. So Vernicia is not a reliable witness in this...

I got no questions

1 You did not see anything because I am innocent and you have no screenshots proving I throwed it 2 did not damage his reputation since nothing even happened

I have no witness

What I have done before has nothing with this case to do I might have done bad things before but that does not mean that I threw the fatman on GamingFishy. I am innocent and I didnt not throw a fatman at GamingFishy. Also a so called witness is not always a witness some people are acting as...

1 I have not threw a fatman at anybody it exist no evidence of me throwing a fatman to Gamingfishy 2 its clear that his case is only motivated by money he only want to sue me to earn money and that he claims that I have tried to frame him is a lie 3 Its a big chance this case is politically...

Derpy why didnt you make Chickens the national animal of Redmont I do agree that parrots are cool but it would be better with Chickens

I am innocent I have not done slander the defendants claims against me has very weak evidence and we both can see that I have not commited slander on him. In my opinion it is very clear that I havent commited slander on Pepper I didnt even mention Pepper at all so its very weird that he tries to...

I have no witness that I wish to call

this case is not about slander he just wants to make money from me. Pepper only sued me because he didnt like me as a politican and I see this as an attemtp to try and quiet the opposition by suing them for not having the same political ideas as they themselfs have. Also it exist no evidence...

1 The plaintiffs reason for suing me is only because he wants money nothing proves I commited slander against him 2 I never said that Pepper was a terrorist or a traitor I said P*p*r is a traitor and a terrorist and that could be anyone I never said that Pepper was one since I said P*p*r that...

I only have to appear right you havent opened the opening statements yet

I am innocent