Search results

Sorry for two messages - same timeline applies. 48 hours for questions, 48 hours for responses.

The defence may cross-examine the witnesses called by the plaintiff.

I will give the plaintiff 48 hours to present their questions. The witness @Vernicia has 48 hours to respond upon the questions being presented.

@Vernicia is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont.

Apologies -- continuing the message here. As the witness has been quite active in the public channels, and given that he was given twice the amount that is normally afforded to witnesses and still yet has failed, I issue a warning to the witness @GnomeWhisperer and give 24 extra hours beginning...

I don't quite understand by what you mean you its "unreasonable" for you to "calculate and determine the exact extent to which [you] are contesting the damages", as I asked whether or not you contest the value given in the damages or the method in which it was calculated. There was no...

I will allow the defendant to state specifically to which extent they wish to contest the compensatory damages before I make a ruling on this.

Apologies for the delay. The Discovery period is hereby over. The plaintiff has 72 hours to provide the court their opening statement.

The court accepts the motion and dismisses the case without prejudice.

The plaintiff now may present questions to the witnesses, within the following 48 hours. The witnesses have a further 48 hours to answer, after which any follow-up questions may be asked within a further 48 hours, and so on.

@Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of RaiTheGuy07 v. Commonwealth of Redmont.

@GnomeWhisperer and @Mask3D_WOLF are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont as witnesses.

I will be taking over this case. The case has hereby been refiled as [2025] FCR 20. The court shall hereby go into discovery to last a maximum of 72 hours unless explicitly extended.

Before a summons can be issued, can the plaintiff provide proof of representation?

Thank you. The defendant now has 48 hours beginning now to present their opening statement to the court.

@End as you have already been warned, and have continued the behaviour of unsolicited and out of order comments within the courtroom, the court hereby finds it appropriate that the plaintiff be charged with one charge of Contempt of Court, and instruct the DHS to carry out the appropriate...

Motion denied. This objection is overruled. The response to the objection is accurate and is upheld by the court. The court will allow this modification, as the modifications can be made to prayers during discovery, and I was busy and therefore did not move forward with the case and was...

Let me start this post by apologising for the lateness of the court on the manner as I was traveling from Japan to East Coast USA, and was unavailable for the some time before, during, and after that. I am officially back on my duties. That being said; All of these are out of order and will...

Objection sustained. Objection sustained. Objection sustained. Objection overruled. While not explicitly in the procedures, I do not believe this is disruptive to the court. The court does recommend and urge everyone to include appropriate pings within their original message, though. This...

In that case, the court sustains this objection. The discovery is now over, and the plaintiff now has 48hours for their opening statement. I apologise for the delay in the last 2 days as I was traveling from Japan to East Coast US.