Search results

The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Psypio (represented by Stoltenberg & Partners at Law) Defendant OPENING STATEMENT Your honor, we have numbered our points in line with those of the Defendant for your convenience. 1. The defense claims there was no quid pro quo and therefore...

I would also like to formally note that at no point did I request to summon either xEndeavour the Owner nor xEndeavour the Representative. They are not my witness.

I would also like to formally make note to the Court that the Defense and the Prosecution have failed to reach an agreement for a plea deal. We would like to continue with this lawsuit.

Your honor, may I rebut the above objection? Thank you.

I would like for all of the witnesses to answer the following questions at their earliest convenience. If you do not feel comfortable answering any of the questions for any reason, simply state that as your response to the question you wish to skip. Thank you. 1. In your opinion, does barring...

The prosecution has met with the Defendants legal counsel and would like to postpone this lawsuit until the next Attorney General takes office on the 15th of this month to ensure a plea deal, if one occurs, is properly ratified by the State.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Psypio Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: A candidate for the Willow Commerce Advisor elections made an...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION MilkCrack Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant OPENING STATEMENT The Plaintiff alleges that the State has rejected a Constitutional Amendment from becoming law on the basis that it has passed the House, the...

Objection, your honor. The argument the Plaintiff presents under the spoiler titled "Defence's Argument No. 3:" is not just flawed, it is flatly wrong. For starters, and to be fair I am willing to give the Plaintiff the benefit of the doubt in believing this is a formatting error, but the...

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defense move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The bill did not pass by supermajority in the House of Representatives and therefore has failed that requirement to...

Your honor, I will be representing the State in this matter as a State Prosecutor. Before you issue a decision on the emergency injunction I would like to bring your attention to a few key facts that could materially influence your decision: 1. The Best Ballot Act did NOT receive the...

- Client Name: hugebob23456 - Counsel Name: hugebob23456 - Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff - Reason for the Appeal: A fundamental misunderstanding of what the case was based on, as well as a truly dangerous reading of the letter of the law. A motion to dismiss...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS hugebob23456 Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your honor, for the convenience of the Court I will be using the same numbering system as the Defendant and...

I believe editing the initial message poses risks related to the authenticity of my express citations from the Constitution. Don't worry, I will reiterate and make clear all of my claims in my closing statement as is standard practice for me.

Yes, in fact this new development brings further claims. The clause in the Constitution I had cited has since been removed, despite the Judicial Standards Act not expressly removing any parts of the Constitution. Someone has arbitrarily removed parts of the Constitution without approval from...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION hugebob23456 Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: It is an extremely critical concept that only those who have the powers to cast votes in Supreme Court...

Your honor, Forgive me for speaking out of turn, merely bumping this thread for your convenience. Thank you.