Search results

  1. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Follow Up Questions You have indicated to the court that you are not a DCT employee. Can you please explain why you messaged my client on 6/11/24 informing them of an eviction of their plot? Please reference (P-005). Did you or the DCT decide to evict plot 'OR-VALLEY-15'? What was the reason...
  2. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Objection - Nothing Pending Your Honor, The answer to question 2 goes way outside the scope and the simple response of the question. We request that the response outside of the specific answer be struck. "As Oakridge Mayor I have very important relations to the department. Every paste the...
  3. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Follow Up Questions Who has the authority to report plots within the DCT? Does the Mayor of Oakridge have the authority to evict plots? Does DCT policy mandate that BIs need to report the plots on the forums and send mail in-game?
  4. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Response to Objection Your Honor, We merely got out days confused in posting our response as I, in my head, firmly believed we had 48 hours to publish the questions to the witnesses. However, now looking back I realize I was gravely mistaken. I accept the contempt charge as I fully...
  5. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Yeet_Boy (@YeetBoy1872325 ) 1. Are you currently employed by the Department of Construction and Transportation? 2. What are your relations to the Department of Construction and Transportation? The_Superior10 (@The_Superior10 ) 1. What is your current Department of Construction and...
  6. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, Respectfully the time has come and gone and the defendant has failed to provide their response. We request a that we progress this case.
  7. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Opening Statements Your Honor, Today, I stand to defend not just the rights of my client, BoopingBerry, but the very principles of fairness and justice in our community. BoopingBerry is a dedicated and peace-loving resident of Oakridge, who has always adhered to the rules and contributed...
  8. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    your honor, I’d like to request a two hour extension I got held up at a family event, saying goodbye to my aunt before she flew home. I may be within the next hour. I sadly don’t have access to my computer.
  9. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, We would like to enter the following list of individuals to be our witnesses. 1. Yeet_Boy (Plaintiff) 2. TheSuperior (Inspection Manager in the DCT)
  10. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, We want to enter the following into evidence.
  11. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION BoopingBerry (Nacholebraa representing) Plaintiff v. Town of Oakridge Defendant COMPLAINT On 6/11/24, BoopingBerry, my client, received a notification from the Mayor of Oakridge, Yeet_Boy, informing her that the DCT would...
  12. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT EMERGENCY INJUNCTION We request the court to freeze the plot mentioned below from being sold or held by the government in any capacity and restrict the commonwealth's ability to evict future plots in the same manner. Emergency injunctions are...
  13. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Yes, your honor, that is correct. I did not realize you were asking a clarifying question.
  14. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, We didn't submit the witnesses because we didn't need them, so there is nothing to strike. We did not submit the witness out of care and consideration for the Plaintiff, who we knew would just complain the whole time about it.
  15. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, I had not seen your message and rushed to get this put together and finalized, as I didn't wish to be late for a response.
  16. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    OPENING STATEMENTS Your Honor, In this case, the plaintiff presented a narrative suggesting their dismissal was unfair, primarily due to a lack of communication and vague reasoning. However, the facts paint a different picture. The plaintiff claims they were dismissed without a clear...
  17. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, The state will have to request a 12-hour extension due to scheduling conflicts with personal matters happening IRL.
  18. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Objection - Breach of Procedure Your Honor, We believe the previous Presiding Judge's extension to the Plaintiff has come and gone. The state would like to request that we skip the Plaintiff's opening statement and move on to our opening statement. This is a clear-cut disregard for the...
  19. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, The state would like to request clarification as to where we are at within the case. Currently I am of the understanding that the Plaintiff has missed their deadline extension given by the previous presiding officer. However, did not note a formal notice for us to present our...
  20. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, The Plaintiff is attempting to regain their case, which is commendable. However, they just displayed within their thread that they don't recognize the authority of the chair of the case. They demonstrated they intend to bash and ignore the...
Back
Top