Search results

  1. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] DCR 40

    OBJECTION Perjury The Plaintiff has once again stated that the DOJ has violated their right to not self incriminate, however Section IV, Clause V only applies to the court of law, congressional hearings, subpoenas, and impeachment trials. This Clause of the Constitution is not up for...
  2. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] DCR 40

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, Opposing Counsel, Throughout this whole case, from the very beginning, the Plaintiff has claimed that being asked to dispute his bank robbery charge is a violation of Section IV, Clause V of the Constitution...
  3. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] DCR 40

    For A__C: What is Department of Justice policy in the event of an invisible person being found in the immediate vicinity of the vault after the bank alarm rings?
  4. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] DCR 40

    For @A__C : What is Department of Justice policy in the event of the an invisible person being found after the bank alarm rings, and gold blocks are found missing or altered in the vault?
  5. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] DCR 40

    Good evening, Your Honor, opposing counsel. The Defense does not wish to cross examine the witnesses.
  6. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Wetc FCR [2022] 57

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Wetc Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: Former DEC Secretary Wetc announced his resignation on July 13th, effective...
  7. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Kavq v. Department of Justice [2022] DCR 32

    Your Honor, the allotted 48 hours have passed and I respectfully request we move on without the plaintiff's rebuttal.
  8. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Kavq v. Department of Justice [2022] DCR 32

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Kavq Plaintiff v. Department of Justice Defendant The defence move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The Debt Recovery Quick Fix Act (DRQFA) outlines the...
  9. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned KP56 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] DCR 20

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, It has long since been precedent, according to the officer and the Secretary, that when the door is broken and the alarms are going off, that the person at the scene who broke the door will be arrested and...
  10. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned KP56 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] DCR 20

    The Defense has no further questions, Your Honor.
  11. Neemfy

    Redundant 24 Karat Act

    A BILL To Steal the Commonwealth’s Gold The people of Democracy Craft, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short Title and Enactment...
  12. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Tan_Head v. The DOJ [2022] DCR 6

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Tan_head Plaintiff v. The Department of Justice Defendant Although a series of unfortunate events could have led to the crime, it is still the responsibility of the person to serve the time in jail and pay the fine...
  13. Neemfy

    Count to 1,000,000

    610
  14. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Tan_Head v. The DOJ [2022] DCR 6

    For RelaxedGV: 1. Did Tan_head fall through the barriers? 2. Was there an officer on scene when they fell through the barriers? For TheRukia: 1. Did Tan_head make a DOJ Ticket on the discord after they were arrested?
  15. Neemfy

    Expungement: Granted Awesomeness_Boy [2022] FCR 16

    Given that two months have passed since the charge has occurred, the Attorney General's Office, on behalf of the State, believes that the charge should be expunged.
  16. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Tan_Head v. The DOJ [2022] DCR 6

    The Defendant calls RelaxedGV as a witness.
  17. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Tan_Head v. The DOJ [2022] DCR 6

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Tan_head Plaintiff v. The Department of Justice Defendant I. OPENING STATEMENT The Plaintiff has repeated that their rights have been violated, and that the Police Officer that had arrested them strayed from Department...
  18. Neemfy

    Expungement: Granted drew8716 [2022] FCR 14

    Apologies for the wait, Given that two months have passed since the charge has occurred, the Attorney General's Office, on behalf of the State, believes that the charge should be expunged.
  19. Neemfy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Tan_Head v. The DOJ [2022] DCR 6

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Tan_head Plaintiff v. The Department of Justice Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. (1st Claim for Relief) Dispute: Right XIV of the Constitution states the following: “Every citizen has the right to life, liberty, and...
Back
Top