Search results

I will be granting the Motion to Dismiss, because the Attorney General at the time, Dartanman, knew about the error of law. Because the Attorney General represents the entire Department of Legal Affairs, it is safe to say that the DLA has known about the error for quite some time. Therefore, it...

Apologies, the Emergency Injunction is granted. The DOC may not seize any of xAntho_ny's properties, balance, or bank account balance.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Attorney General is required to appear before the court in the case of the xAntho_ny v. The Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT @ko531 is required to appear before the court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. ko531. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff. I'd also like to remind both parties...

Case dismissed at the request of the plaintiff.

The Constitutionality of both the motion proposed and the rejection of putting up the motion are still in question. However, if the President of the Senate believes the proposed motion to be unconstitutional, the prevention of it coming to vote could mitigate damages caused by them in the future...

Because MilkCrack was acting in a Government capacity and the injunction directly impacts the Senate, this injunction and subsequent lawsuit should be filed against the Commonwealth. I am dismissing this case without prejudice, and requesting it to be refiled against the Commonwealth.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Commonwealth of Redmont v. Town of Oakridge [2023] FCR 107 I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION 1. According to the Constitution, the Department of State is charged with the facilitation of elections. 2. The Executive Order 19/23 states that all...

The Defense has failed to provide an Opening Statement within the allotted time. I hereby charge zLost with Contempt of Court. The Court will now be in recess pending a verdict.

Thank you, Snowy_Heart. The Defendant now has 72 hours to provide an Opening Statement.

Case dismissed at the request of the plaintiff.

Seeing as the Prosecution has not provided any witnesses or evidence and the 7 days has elapsed, we will now move on to Opening Statements. The Prosecution has 72 hours to produce an Opening Statement.

We will now move on to Opening Statements. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to provide an Opening Statement.

Case dismissed at the request of the plaintiff.

I will be granting an extension until Tuesday, January 2nd due to the holiday weekend.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Dubiousbird v. modzy_. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff. I'd also like to...

Objection overruled. The contents of the chat are the focus, and do not appear to be altered or modified in any way. The rest of the screenshot is irrelevant.

The Prosecution's objection is sustained. The Defense's objections will be struck. Please refile the Objections with proper formatting. Any subsequent objections not following format will be struck and the counsel will be held in contempt. We will now move on to the Discovery phase of the...

We will now be moving onto the Discovery phase of the trial. Both sides have 7 days to provide evidence and a list of witnesses.

Does the Defense agree to summary judgement after opening statements?