Search results

OBJECTION Relevance These arguments, despite arguing the definition of a tax, still do not prove why the third prayer for relief should be dismissed. Their argument only alleges that the DCT is entitled to the "lost fees," which makes this argument irrelevant against my Motion to Dismiss...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, Opposing Counsel, While the DCT is charged with managing the Public Transportation network, they are not charged with managing fares or any other related taxes. They simply manage the operation, construction, and...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Dismiss The Commonwealth, while not wanting to dismiss the entire case, motions to dismiss the 3rd Prayer for Relief in the “IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF” section of the filing on the following grounds: The Plaintiff is not entitled to the...

Good morning, Your Honor. Me, Anthony, and Drippzy_Tox will be taking the case on behalf of the DLA. We will have an Opening Statement up shortly.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Respectfully, Your Honor, the Objections guide states the definition of Calls for a Conclusion as "The questions asks for an opinion rather than facts."

OBJECTION #1 Calls for a Conclusion Question 2 asks for an opinion, and has no relevance to an eviction. OBJECTION #2 Relevance Question 4 is irrelevant. How an eviction will personally affect someone has no bearing on an eviction.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT The Commonwealth does not dispute any of the facts stated, and motions for Summary Judgement with the stipulation that the Plaintiff drops legal fees. DATED: This 14th day of March, 2023.

Given that two months have passed since the charges have occurred, the Department of Legal Affairs, on behalf of the State, believes that the charges should be expunged.

Given that two months have passed since the charges have occurred, the Department of Legal Affairs, on behalf of the State, believes that the charges should be expunged.

Given that two months have passed since the charges have occurred, the Department of Legal Affairs, on behalf of the State, believes that the charges should be expunged.

Your Honor, apologies for the issues. Because of the changes in DLA leadership, this case was not able to be attended to. The Commonwealth requests a 48 hour extension in order to properly address the case.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, Opposing Counsel, One of the clear problems with this case was lack of image evidence. I acknowledge this, and attempt to rectify it with a reliable witness testimony. Vernicia is a Sergeant in the Department...

OBJECTION Arguing with the Witness Some clear argumentative hostility towards the witness from the Defendant.

OBJECTION Relevance Those were not questions, they were statements that should have been reserved for Closing Statements.

Thank you, Vernicia. No further questions, Your Honor.

1. Did you see FTGWop throw a Fatman launcher to GamingFishy727? 2. As a police officer, did you witness the subsequent consequences for GamingFishy727?

The plaintiff calls Vernicia as a witness.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, Opposing Counsel, FTGWop is notorious for “not so legal” activities. He is also well known for his dishonesty, and what can only be explained as trolling. In my Opening Statement, I will respond to each of the...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION GamingFishy727 Plaintiff v. FTGWop Defendant COMPLAINT: FTGWop threw a fatman launcher at the plaintiff, nearly getting him charged and damaging his reputation within the DOJ. I. PARTIES 1. GamingFishy727 (Neemfy...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI Following recent information coming to light, the State has decided not to go through with the case. DATED: This 24th day of January, 2023.