IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION
Commonwealth of Redmont
Plaintiff
v.
ko531
Prosecution
COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:
Ko531 sent campaign messages to multiple people on the Do Not Call List...
Apologies for missing the opening statement, Your Honor. The defendant and the state have worked out a plea deal, a guilty plea for a $10,000 fine and a 2 month barring from office.
OBJECTION
Relevance
The defendant has stated that the “crime of bribery” does not apply. While bribery as a crime is listed in the White collar crack down act, the defendant is not charged with bribery, only election fraud. This definition was given in an effort to define bribery in the context...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
Your Honor, opposing counsel,
Election fraud is defined as “Any player caught rigging/meddling with an election through, but not limited to: the use of alternate accounts, bribery, and or threats.” Key word in the...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI
After discussions with the Defendant out of court, the Plaintiff would like to have this case dismissed.
DATED: This 27th day of October, 2022.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Neemfy
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
I have been a State Prosecutor for the DLA since my tenure as Solicitor General ended in May of 2022...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
The Commonwealth does not further dispute any facts of the case. The Plaintiff reacted proportionally to an imminent threat, and was in accordance with the law.
DATED: This 20th day of October, 2022
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Dusty_3
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Commonwealth disputes this fact.
2. The Commonwealth does not dispute this fact.
3. The Commonwealth disputes this fact.
4. The...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
1. The Department of Justice is not omniscient. Bank robbery, in its current state, is near impossible to gain evidence for due to how the game itself works, there are no workarounds. Evidence must be gained based on...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
1. In Evidence Exhibit A of the initial filing, the plaintiff is asked if he would like to dispute the charge, and he refuses to answer. While this is not a no, this is also not a yes, and therefore not an official...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
Your Honor, opposing counsel,
I will be responding to each point of the plaintiff’s opening statement in order.
1. While the cases are slightly different in makeup, the premise is the same. The Plaintiff in...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Dartanman
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Commonwealth does not dispute this fact.
2. The Commonwealth does not dispute this fact.
3. The Commonwealth does not dispute this...
Additionally, I would like to request an injunction against Aladeen to prevent any orders from the previous case to be carried out until it is retried.
- Client Name: Commonwealth of Redmont
- Counsel Name: Neemfy
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Defendant
- Reason for the Appeal: Throughout the whole case, there was a clear bias against the defense.
1. The Magistrate first demonstrated bias at the beginning of the case...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.