Search results

  1. Nacho

    Appeal: Accepted <FCR 35> - Appeal Request

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT The Supreme Court has granted the appeal and declared that [2024] FCR 35 a mistrial. The Supreme Court has decided to do this for the following reasons: 1. The presiding judge erred in misapplying court rule 5.5. The rule is intended only to...
  2. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dodrio3 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 4

    The response is struck in full as the individual is not a party to the case, and neither side requested the comment. Dusty_3 is also held in contempt for speaking within a case in which he is not a party. This is the second offense by the individual, and they are attempting to make a mockery...
  3. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dodrio3 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 4

    The response is struck in full as the individual is not a party to the case, and neither side requested the comment. Dusty_3 is also held in contempt for speaking within a case in which he is not a party.
  4. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    As the witness is now present. The defense may begin their questioning if the witness. Please submit all your question for the witness within the next 48 hours. Should you have a question that is dependent upon the previous answer please indicate it to the court.
  5. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. xLayzur [2024] SCR 1

    As there appears to be a lack of response when reviewing the case docket within the court. The court requests that the prosecution recertify the filing before we re-issue the summons or request that the prosecution withdraw their claims. Please have an answer submitted to the court within 48...
  6. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Krix [2024] SCR 2

    As there appears to be a lack of response when reviewing the case docket within the court. The court requests that the prosecution recertify the filing before we re-issue the summons or request that the prosecution withdraw their claims. Please have an answer submitted to the court within 48...
  7. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @End is required to appear as a witness before the court in the case of the ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a charge of Contempt of Court...
  8. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dodrio3 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 4

    I was unable to respond in time before now. However, the request for the extension was accepted, as we understand the delay and lack of notification. As the plaintiff has provided their closing statement, we will now transition to closing statements from the defense. Please have the closing...
  9. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. UnityMaster [2024] SCR 18

    The court thanks you for providing the plea. We will now transition into a 7-day discovery period. Should either party wish to end discovery early, please note that both parties will need to consent.
  10. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanboy v. Robert [2024] DCR 9

    While the quickness of the recovery and surgical speed displayed is highly suspicious, the defense council has not demonstrated knowledge of the rapid recovery and has made a statement of fact. The court will be overruling the Perjury objection at this time.
  11. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. The Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 45

    The request by the plaintiff is denied as both parties did not agree.
  12. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. UnityMaster [2024] SCR 18

    This is a criminal prosecution. Please resubmit the answer and file the plea to the charges being filed against the defendant.
  13. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    Standing is consistently reviewed throughout the case. Should it be discovered midway through, either side can still motion to dismiss it. While Court procedure dictates that motions to dismiss can only be filed before opening statements, in some cases, they can be public following opening...
  14. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    The Motion is denied. Members of the public can challenge the constitutionality of laws within the Federal Court. While they may not have specific damages related to the application of the law, they can challenge whether a law follows the parameters for being a law. In practice, it is...
  15. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Thegoatt123 v. Crimson Dawn Construction [2024] FCR 42

    The request to skip discovery is denied due to both parties not agreeing.
  16. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned dodrio3 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 4

    The court apologizes for the delay in response as this case thread had disappeared from our docket within the judiciary discord and was missed by our clerk and me. The court will now progress into closing statements, beginning with the plaintiff. The plaintiff has 48 hours to provide their...
  17. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    While I understand out-of-game life can be hectic and chaotic at times. The Commonwealth is empowered with various resources and personnel to be able to respond with an extension request or provide the opening statement. It does not require the same individual to respond to the case each time...
  18. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33

    The motion is denied. The court does not see this as hindering your right to a speedy trial, as no evidence of purposeful delaying of the case was presented or is evident within the case.
  19. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanboy v. Robert [2024] DCR 9

    The Defense may respond to the objection.
  20. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dartanboy v. Robert [2024] DCR 9

    As either side did not provide any witnesses the court will be progressing to closing statements. The plaintiff has 48 hours to provide their closing statement.
Back
Top