Search results

  1. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Smokeyybunnyyy V. GisUsAQuiche [2023] FCR 89

    The Defendant’s failure to appear within the 72 hour timeframe given to them by this court has resulted in the default judgment of this case. The Defendant remains legally active on the server, with a playtime of over 2 days in the past 30 days, they have an active forums and Discord account...
  2. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    After reviewing the evidence, it is clear that it does not obtain any classified information, and as such will be fine to move forward in open court. Given that the defense sent the evidence about 24 hours after the original call for their opening statement to be submitted, I am extending the...
  3. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    I will come to a decision shortly on how to proceed further. Your time to post an opening statement will be paused in the meantime however.
  4. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pressler, Felt & Warshaw, LLP v. Yahiakiller [2023] FCR 90

    My apologies. They have now been summoned there as well
  5. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pressler, Felt & Warshaw, LLP v. Yahiakiller [2023] FCR 90

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Pressler, Felt & Warshaw, LLP v. Yahiakiller. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the...
  6. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    The previous outburst will be stricken from the record, and the contempt charge shall remain.
  7. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    Thank you for the clarification on representation moving forward. As this case was filed prior to the Supreme Court's meeting which amended court policies on October 17, 2023, we will continue moving on a 48 hour timeline rather than the new 72 hour one. As such, the Defendant has 48 hours from...
  8. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    I expect a filing for the opening statement from the Defendant within 48 hours moving forward, filed by Sumo or an appropriate employee of his firm.
  9. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    I have since noticed that the lawyer who previously relieved himself from this case has now submitted a new lawsuit, specifically Lawsuit: Pending - UnityMaster, SumoMC & CopTop_YT v. The Commonwealth of Redmont. This is a major disrespect to this court, and one which will not go unnoticed...
  10. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    The defendant will be given a 72 hour extension to find new counsel, and once found they must announce themselves here along with affirmation of representation for the defendant. From there we will move forward
  11. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    I hate this came so late, but hope everything is going well. You are dismissed from further duties in this case.
  12. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Smokeyybunnyyy V. GisUsAQuiche [2023] FCR 89

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the Smokeyybunnyyy v. GisUsAQuiche. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff. I'd also...
  13. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 66

    I thank the Defendant for their closing statement. I now call upon the Plaintiff to provide theirs. I understand this is not traditional flow of closing statements, however due to the circumstances I hope all parties understand. The Plaintiff now has 48 hours to provide the court with their...
  14. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 66

    After much thought, I will approve the motion to reconsider, due to the circumstances. However, I must make it clear that should an event like this occur further, I will not be so generous. The court of course agrees real life certainly comes first, which is why the contempt charge was placed on...
  15. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 66

    To clarify my last submission, the Defendant maintains the same timeline as provided before, meaning there is approximately 44 hours from now for their submission to submitted on time to this court.
  16. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 66

    The court has moved on from the Plaintiff's closing statement, however the court will take into account the reason as to why one was unable to be provided. This should be a learning moment for the organization in question, which is the 'Lovely Law Firm,' to accurately maintain the progression...
  17. D

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Galavance v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 66

    Due to the failure of the attorney to promptly respond to the case when requested, the Lovely Law Firm as the organization who employs said attorney is held in contempt of court. The court now calls upon the Defendant to provide the court with their closing statement within 48 hours from now.
  18. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    Alright thank you. The extension request is hereby granted from the original deadline
  19. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    I don't see it clarified anywhere on the court record, but I am assuming Dumbyhead1234 has changed their username to v__d since this lawsuit was filed?
  20. D

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bardiya_King v. Dumbyhead1234 [2023] FCR 80

    Thank you for a timely response. The Defendant now has 48 hours to present an opening statement to the court.
Back
Top