In the Court of Democracycraft
Summons
Case No. 10-2020-09
The Court of Democracycraft orders the Department of Justice to act as a defendant in the case of Vanquish_ap vs. Department of Justice. If the defendant does not respond to this court within twenty four hours, at the time of 1:20am...
Zlost, the court finds you in contempt. You have not been called as a witness or been introduced to this court. Your testimony has no impact on this courts decisions. You will be charged with First Degree Contempt.
The Motion to Dismiss by the defendant has been approved. Do to a lack of evidence provided by the plaintiff, there has been no evidence to prove that Partypig678 had caused an open wound to CorbinJc by direct action. Stating that because Partpig678 and CorbinJc were in the same place at the...
In the Court of Democracycraft
Writ of Summons
No. 10-2020-13
The Court hereby summons Partypig678 to make their case in CorbinJc Vs Partypig678. If the defendant does not respond within twenty four hours, at the time of 11:00pm MDT, 10/14/20, a judgement will be passed in favor of the plaintiff.
The defendants request to dismiss the case is denied. As the urgency of this affair called for immediate action.
Both sides have made their case, it is apparent that the defendant has made a mockery of not only our constitution and system of government but, showed clear disregard for the...
Court of Democracycraft
Writ of summons
The Court of Democracycraft issues a summons for Norbjr to act as defendant in JanGo515 vs. NorbJr. If the defendant fails to reply in twenty four hours, at the time off 9:15 MDT 10/12/2020, a default judgment will be given in favor of the plaintiff.
Court of Democracycraft
Writ of Summons
The court hereby issues a summons to Simplyspooky. If not answered by 10/12/20 9:00pm MDT, a ruling will be given in favor of the plaintiff.
It is recognized by the court that attempt of slander was made by the defendant. However, due to insufficient evidence of real harm done to the reputation of the plaintiff. It would not be an appropriate action of this court to order restitution. Therefore this case is hereby dismissed.
Wonderful, now that this is out of the way. I would like some clarification. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has slandered him. What reason is there a contract?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.