Search results

  1. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honour, I am requesting a 48hr extension as I am out of town with very little cell service for Easter
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    EpicFought (Devaculous) 1. In the Employee Handbook from the time you were employed at the Department of Justice, was there any mention of AI not being permitted in your work? 2. Did you write the majority of your arguments yourself? 3. After your employer informed you that you should not use...
  3. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - SPECULATION This part of the answer is speculative and is not factual testimony, only an assumption. P-003 and P-004 convey that the great majority of my client's work was his own. The fact that he used AI to aid him in this...
  4. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE The question assumes that EpicFought displayed conduct unbecoming of a prosecutor. Opposing counsel has failed to provide evidence detailing that my client's conduct was unbecoming of a prosecutor...
  5. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Apologies your honour, I hope the Court can forgive my being late: 1. NotADoctor7819 and NotADoctor9217 (aka Doc) (NotADoctor7819) 2. Doesn't appear to have Discord or forums 3. Argen_Lee (Argen) 4. RaiTheGuy07 (MasterAshim) (MasterAshim)
  6. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your honour, today I will argue that my client’s termination was unjust and arbitrary. To do this, we will go through the interrogatory answers, and then a thorough analysis of every reasoning for the grounds of termination...
  7. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Yes, as I am dealing with some IRL things right now. I ask to please have just 24 extra hours
  8. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO SUBMIT LATE EVIDENCE Your honour, we were under the impression that the Defense would comply and post the Handbook. Since that may not be the case anymore, I respectfully ask that we are allowed to post it instead. This piece of...
  9. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honour, what I ask here is simple. The Employee Policy publicly posted has been altered and is improper evidence for this case. We have provided evidence to prove that there is another document (the Employee...
  10. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE The Defense is assuming that my client killed him for the money. While he received the bounty, it doesn't mean it's why he killed him. This unfairly skews my client's image.
  11. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Your honour, I am requesting to please have a 24-hour extension due to unforeseen circumstances.
  12. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Your honour, just to clarify, is the DoJ's previous response being allowed as the response to the motion to compel? Since the original court order was for the DoJ to "provide either the employee policy from the time Epicfought was fired or provide evidence showing what exactly was edited between...
  13. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Good evening, your honor and everyone present, Today I will demonstrate how verbal consent is still valid nowadays, and how, under established norms, the Defendant’s actions fail to fall under fair dismissal and undermine the very justice the DHS vows to protect and uphold. On Murder and...
  14. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE Your honour, the document attached serves only as evidence for the perjury objection. Perjury, to be considered, must show proof that the opposing party is aware that what they have said is false. (See Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10) The Employee...
  15. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your honor, in addition to not complying with our motion to compel, the DoJ is knowingly making a false statement, as we are certain there is a Department of Justice policy handbook which was valid at the time of my...
  16. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honor, I would like to please request a 30 hour extension for the opening statement deadline as I’m currently out of town.
  17. S

    Name The weirdest thing you ever ate.

    Nah it was pretty bad tbh
Back
Top