Search results

  1. S

    Name The weirdest thing you ever ate.

    I had crocodile soup when I went to cairns ps. Don’t go to cairns
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    We would like to submit the following evidence:
  3. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    INTERROGATORY: 1. Does the Department of Justice only terminate employees if they break the current code of conduct? 2. Is it fair to assume that a prosecutor employed in the Department of Justice is more qualified in the law than a regular citizen? 3. Does the Department of Justice, to the...
  4. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE Apologies, your honor. The message above was a mistype.
  5. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Opposing counsel could have checked my bio before objecting, which points out that I am employed in Dragon Law. I have also been assigned to handle this case.
  6. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL Your honor, since opposing counsel has not provided a relevant document detailing the DoJ's employee policy, we would like to request that the DoJ release their employee policy handbook for the time my client was employed...
  7. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE Upon reviewing the full document from where D-003 was extracted, it is evident that the document was edited on December 25th, 2024. This date is after my client’s termination, and thus any mention of AI use could have...
  8. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honor, we request an additional 48 hour extension so we can get our client’s requested information privately from the Department of Homeland Security.
  9. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honor, we request a 48-hour extension of Discovery as we have requested information from DHS and are awaiting their response.
  10. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    We would like to add the following piece of evidence: P-012:
  11. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    We would like to submit the following witness list: 1: Doc 2: IamJeb_ 3: Argen_Lee 4: RaiTheGuy07
  12. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    We submit this additional piece of evidence: P-011:
  13. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    We would like to amend our filing as follows: IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant: 1. Raitheguy07 be found not guilty for the murders of Doc, IamJeb_, and Argen_Lee from Raitheguy07's, and subsequently, his criminal record be expunged. 2. Immediate...
  14. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honor, we wish to add the following pieces of evidence: P-008: P-009: P-010:
  15. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION RaiTheGuy07 (Represented by Superwoops) Plaintiff v. Department of Homeland Security Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: Raitheguy07 was fired from the Department of Homeland Security...
  16. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Superwoops v. ribs_221 [2025] DCR 2

    You honor, I can confirm
  17. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Superwoops v. ribs_221 [2025] DCR 2

    Your honor, the evidence stated provides context as to the location of the event in question.
  18. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Superwoops v. ribs_221 [2025] DCR 2

    Your honor, allotted time frame of 72 hours has elapsed.
  19. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Superwoops v. ribs_221 [2025] DCR 2

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Superwoops Plaintiff v. ribs_221 Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On the 4th of January, 2025, the Defendant, ribs_221, hit me, causing me to lose half a heart. This action caused...
Back
Top