Search results

  1. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    OBJECTION YOUR HONOR - Perjury In Mr. Love’s post, he declared himself the defense, yet he had not at that time provided evidence that he was in fact representing the defendant. Therefore he knowingly gave incorrect information to the court, the VERY definition of the crime we know and love...
  2. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    The prosecution would prefer to continue this case the ole fashioned way.
  3. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    My response is “haha seriously?” This is clearly a typo that was either overlooked when a template was used, or a simple typo, an honest mistake either way that I am sure we have all committed several times over. Perjury is defined as “the act of KNOWINGLY giving incorrect information in...
  4. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, The so-called “proof” provided is extremely unclear. The defendant literally responded with “I don’t know what I’m doing man”. The Federal Court guide states that a photo of an agreement is to be provided. If we treat this as a contract and apply the...
  5. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    MOTION TO STRIKE Your honor, The defendant has not yet provided any evidence that they represent the defendant even after a direct command from this very court. The court would not allow strangers off the street to make motions on any random case in court, therefore AlexanderLove without proof...
  6. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    MOTION TO STRIKE Your honor, The defendant has not yet provided any evidence that they represent the defendant even after a direct command from this very court. The court would not allow strangers off the street to make motions on any random case in court, therefore AlexanderLove without proof...
  7. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    MOTION TO STRIKE Your honor, The defendant has not yet provided any evidence that they represent the defendant even after a direct command from this very court. The court would not allow strangers off the street to make motions on any random case in court, therefore AlexanderLove without proof...
  8. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, Proper Federal Court procedure requires the answer to complaint within the 72 hour window given with the summons. The summons was issued Saturday at 10:01 PM. Saturday to Sunday at 10:01 PM is 24 hours, Sunday to Monday at 10:01 PM is 48 hours, and Monday to...
  9. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Your Honor, The Defense has surpassed their allotted 72 hours to respond to the complaint and therefore is not disputing the facts of this case. In an effort to preserve the Commonwealth, Judiciary’s and...
  10. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ILoveLCN [2024] FCR 112

    Your honor, I will be representing the Commonwealth in this case moving forward. Thank you.
  11. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. FakeLlama360 [2024] SCR 23

    I am no longer acting AG as of yesterday. Technically there was no AG acting or not when you wrote this.
  12. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 96

    Opening Statement Your Honor, In this case, the plaintiff has presented a narrative suggesting that their dismissal was unfair, primarily due to a lack of communication and vague reasoning. However, the facts paint a different picture. The plaintiff claims that they were dismissed without a...
  13. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 96

    MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, I do apologize for the delay. Being that this is my first ever contempt of court charge, I do ask for a bit of grace? I will post our response immediately following this post. I was only pinged once in the summons for this case, in discord and I do believe...
  14. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    That being said, we will move onto witness testimony. I will issue summons shortly starting with the plaintiffs witness. Just to confirm I am not missing anything, the plaintiff is only calling Vroomba as a witness? And the defense is not calling witnesses 4-7, just 1, 2 and 3?
  15. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    As the defense stated, they opted not to call those witnesses, therefore there is nothing to strike. Overruled.
  16. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Seeing as how we have granted extensions for the plaintiff, we will allow this one as well. Thanks.
  17. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Defense will have 72 hours to post their opening statements.
  18. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Thank you, We will now move to the defendants opening statement.
  19. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Seeing as how the opening statements have already been posted, I will deny this motion. I am sure that the Commonwealth will agree that the priority here is making sure that the correct judgment is made on any and all cases, and that given the turbulence this case has had, that a minor delay is...
  20. MrFluffy2U94

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    This motion to dismiss is denied. I see the point that you are trying to make, however according to rule 5.5 "A Motion to Dismiss may be filed for failure to state a claim for relief, or against a claim for relief that has insufficient evidence to support the civil or criminal charge". There was...
Back
Top