Search results

This court will enter recess pending a verdict.

Upon review of this motion, I will deny the request to un-strike the previously stricken evidence. The evidence seen in the screenshot below is stricken and will remain stricken from the case. I do this for 3 reasons. 1- Firstly, it would undermine the previous presiding officers authority to...

This motion is rejected. Rule 5.5 states “A Motion to Dismiss may be filed for failure to state a claim for relief, or against a claim for relief that has insufficient evidence to support the civil or criminal charge.” The plaintiff did state a claim for relief, and has provided evidence to...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @steveshat is required to appear before the court in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Steveshat. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff. I'd...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @Unseatedduke1 is required to appear before the court in the case of the Bombaz2005 v. Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff...

The commonwealth shall be allowed 24 hours to respond.

Hello, I have returned. Upon further thought and review of the new motion to recuse, Relaxed and I have agreed that he shall be recused and replaced with myself as the presiding officer. Although I do not believe that there is a bias in this case with the presiding officer, the case being in...

Given that the plaintiff has yet to provide the requested information, even after a second request from the court, I will sustain this motion to dismiss with prejudice. The Federal Court thanks all parties involved.

This deadline has surpassed with no response from the plaintiff. I hereby hold the plaintiff in contempt of court for not responding.

Greetings, I was asked to provide a verdict on this motion for recusal. I would like to preface this decision with pointing out that I am not making a verdict on any previous decision made by the presiding judge, merely observing the motion to recuse, and the presiding judges conduct to...

This motion is rejected. I will not allow an objection to your own firms comment. Regardless of whether the comment made is speculative or not it is irrelevant as the council made the remark on behalf of their client in open court. I will not allow a professional on either side of the case to...

Pleas provide your response with the requested evidence, and I will take it into consideration.

Overruled. I will not allow an objection to a statement made by your own firm on behalf of your client. This is quite unprofessional and I recommend that you ensure your answers accurately represent the will of your client prior to responding in court. Also, moving forward please declare ALL...

Before I rule on this, I want the plaintiff to provide screenshots of the initial request where the defendant solicited services from the plaintiff. There is one message that states “you will be paid this video editing”. This statements leads me to believe that perhaps this was an additional...

Granted, the plaintiff shall be required to answer this question within 48 hours of it being ask d. The defense has 4 remaining interrogatories.

We will now move into a 7 day discovery period.

This motion to dismiss is denied. The motion was for lack of claim, for which this court deems the claim in this case is a potentially valid one. The defendant has proven that the plaintiff did ask for their services, and it shall be the purpose of this lawsuit to determine if that original...

It is the opinion of this court that your motion to dismiss for lack of claim boils down to a lack of evidence, which would typically be denied due to the discovery phase not having yet been completed. The claim itself is that a contract was broken, and that is valid grounds for a lawsuit...

**IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT** WRIT OF SUMMONS @Bibsfi4a is required to appear before the Federalz Court in the case of Starlight0661 v. Bibsfi4a. Failure to appear within **72 **hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the...

This case has been dismissed at the request of the plaintiff.